GET THE APP

Effects of Er:YAG Laser and 2% Chlorhexidine on Microleakage | 5449

Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Effects of Er:YAG Laser and 2% Chlorhexidine on Microleakage of a Self-Adhesive Agent (Bond Force) in Class V Composite Restorations

Author(s): Shahin Kasraei, Ahmad Najafi-Abrandabadi, Hadi Kokabi-Arasteh, Mohadese Azarsina*

Abstract

Introduction: Investigating methods to decrease microleakage can improve the durability of composite resin restorations. Aims: Evaluating the effect of surface treatments with Er:YAG (Erbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet) laser and chlorhexidine (CHX) prior to a self-etching adhesive on microleakage of class V composite restorations after a 6-months water storage.

Materials and Methods: Class-V cavities were prepared at the cement-enamel-junction of sound premolars (n=16). The study groups were as follows: control (C), 2% CHX application, Er:YAG laser treatment (2940 nm wavelength, 10 Hz pulse repetition rate, 0.5 W power) prior to bonding (Er), and after six months of water storage as follows: CW, CHXW, ErW. After application of Bond Force adhesive (Tokoyama Corp.), the cavities were restored with light-cured composite. The samples were stored in fuschin and marginal microleakage was assessed immediately and after six months of water storage. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests (p<0.05).

Results and Discussion: CHX or laser had no significant effect on dentin and enamel marginal microleakage of restorations (P>0.05). Six months of water storage had no significant effect on microleakage at dentin and enamel margins (P>0.05). Microleakage at the enamel margins was lower than dentin margins before and after water storage (P=0.001).

Conclusion: Er:YAG laser or 2% CHX prior to the adhesive application had no effect on microleakage of class-V composite restorations.

<

Share this article

http://sacs17.amberton.edu/