GET THE APP

Correlation between Lipid Profile and Blood Pressure Levels: A Comparative Analysis between Healthy Controls, Type 1 Diabetics and Type 2 Diabetics

Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 2

Correlation between Lipid Profile and Blood Pressure Levels: A Comparative Analysis between Healthy Controls, Type 1 Diabetics and Type 2 Diabetics

Sana Bilal1*, Uzma Raza2, Zia Ullah Khan3, Hamida Ghulam Hussain4, Aatkah Naseer5, Adeeba Salahuddin6, Tabassum Fatima7 and Muzainah Khan8

*Correspondence: Sana Bilal, Specialist Family medicine, Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, United Arab Emirates, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Objective: Dyslipidemia is one of the major risk factor of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. The distinctive aspects of diabetic dyslipidemia include high plasma triglyceride concentration, low concentration of HDL cholesterol and increased level of small densely packed LDL-cholesterol particles. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the lipid abnormalities with blood pressure in control, type 1 and 2 Diabetes mellitus. Methodology: This was an observational, descriptive study conducted in diabetic outpatient department (OPD) of Jinnah post graduate medical institute, Karachi by using non-probability convenient sampling technique. The duration of study was about six months. The study sample comprised of 30 participants each in the control, type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes groups. Blood pressure was measured and blood samples were drawn to assess the biochemical diagnostic parameters such as: Fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride [TG]). Chi-square test and Pearson's correlation was used to determine the variables association with T2DM and T1DM. Results: The study results showed that diastolic blood pressure level was significantly correlated only with the triglyceride level (ρ=-0.419, p=0.021). It was also revealed that among the type 2 diabetes group, systolic blood pressure level was significantly correlated only with the HDL level (ρ=0.454, p=0.012) whereas the diastolic blood pressure level was not significantly correlated with any parameter of the lipid profile while among the type 1 diabetes group, both the systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were not significantly correlated with any parameter of the lipid profile. Conclusion: This study concluded that systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in dyslipidemic patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, among them low HDL was frequently observed. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly correlated with Triglycerides level in control group.

Keywords

Dyslipidemia, Triglyceride, High density lipoprotein, Type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic state of disease that arises with inadequate production of insulin or ineffectively used of insulin by body. Type 2 diabetic patients have a significantly greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than individuals without diabetes [1]. Diabetes was formerly considered to be a disease of the wealthy individuals and mostly observed in urban areas but owing to urbanization, dietary changes and a more sedentary lifestyle for most of the people, middle-income and low-income countries like Pakistan has been affected [2].

The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) stated in its Atlas the incidence of diabetes for Pakistan to be predicted 6.8% between 20–79 years of age [3]. Although healthcare workers always thought this to be underestimated. Consequently, there were contradictory results with occurrence ranging from7.2% to 19.21% in different regions of the Pakistan [4].

Globally, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with associated cardiovascular complications is main public health dilemma. T2DM individuals have two to four times increased probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) that is the primary reason of death among T2DM patients [5]. Dyslipidemia and hypertension are most important variable risk factors for T2DM and associated CAD that is accounted for above 87% of disability in lower and middle class nations [6,7]. Additionally, prediabetes (an intermediary metabolic condition between normal glucose level and T2DM) has also been observed to be related with higher chances for cardiovascular disease [8].

Dyslipidemia in diabetes patients are characteristically recognized by high Total cholesterol (T-Chol), high triglycerides (Tg), low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and higher levels of small densely packed LDL particles. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels could be normal or moderately increased. Abnormalities in lipid profile are commonly found in T2DM and prediabetes individuals [9,10] but variation in different lipids exist between racial groups, financial levels, and entrance to health care system [11,12]. A currently available meta-analysis revealed that abnormalities in lipid parameters indicate, somewhat, the possibility of T2DM [13]. Moreover, several researches revealed a significant association between CAD and combination of high Tg and low HDL-C in T2DM patients as compared to the individual evaluation of two lipid parameters [14,15].

As far as Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is concerned, Dyslipidemia and Hyperglycemia are metabolic discrepancies usually found in these young patients and both augment the probability of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In patients with T1DM, chances of atherosclerosis are increasing that leads to increased morbidity and mortality [16]. A number of researches have described abnormalities of serum lipids along with association between elevated glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum lipid levels in children with T1DM [17,18]. Dyslipidemia is an avoidable risk factor for CVD. Therefore, Screening for dyslipidemia should be carried out almost immediately following diagnosis when diabetes has controlled in all children with T1DM above 10 years of age (International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes) and this should be repeated after each 5 year at normal glycemic control. Screening should initiate at 2 year of age when there is a strong family history of hypercholesterolemia and earlier CVD with unknown family history [19].

The experimental trials for emergent innovative remedial policies for diabetes often focused on correcting dyslipidemia [20-22]. The skilled panel of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in 2011 suggested universal lipid screening for children between 9 to 11 years of age and this has been approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) [23]. This principle was produced to give timely recognition of probable risks and support cardiovascular health. In North America, Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the principal cause of death in adults [24]. The usual lipid profile involves total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides (TG). By the help of these parameters values, low density lipoprotein (LDL), TC/HDL ratio and non-HDL cholesterol are evaluated for clinical assessment. Cut off points for abnormal lipid levels (TC ≥ 200 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol ≤ 35 mg/dL, and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL) were considered [25].

Approximately half of all deaths in type 2 diabetes patients are caused by Cardiovascular disease (CVD) [24], while rising incidence of cardiovascular events are caused by the existence of diabetes at a population level [26]. A number of epidemiological researches have evidently revealed a direct association between blood pressure, blood glucose level, LDL-cholesterol, and the diabetes complications [27,28].

To understand the relationship between serum lipid parameters and different phases of glucose intolerance is of remarkable clinical and public health significance and such statistics can generate the source for future prevention strategies for diabetes and its associated complications in Pakistan. The aim of the present study was to compare the correlation between serum lipid abnormalities and blood pressure in patients with control, type 1 and 2 Diabetes mellitus.

Methodology

This was an observational, descriptive study conducted in diabetic outpatient department (OPD) of Jinnah post graduate medical institute, Karachi by using nonprobability convenient sampling technique. The duration of study was about six months after taking the approval of synopsis from the concerned department. The study sample comprised of 30 participants each in the control, type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes groups. Patients with type I and II diabetes mellitus of both gender, age >40 years for type II diabetes and age >10 years for type I diabetes were included in the study whereas patient taking diuretics therapy, significant co-morbidities like Chronic liver disease, Ischemic heart diseases, patients who have undergone major transplant surgeries, patients with end stage renal disease and gastro intestinal disease were excluded from the study.

Blood samples of participants were drawn from the diabetic clinics of Jinnah Post graduate Medical Center (JPMC), Karachi and Dow University Ojha Campus, Karachi. After taking the permission, blood collected in the non- heparinized tube was instantly centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 20 minutes. The clear supernatants serum was used for measuring a range of biochemical investigative parameters like Random blood glucose levels, Fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, Fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglyceride [TG]) in conditions of metabolic stability following minimum 8 hours of fasting. Blood pressure was measured two times in the right arm in both sitting and standing position. Measurements were taken 5 min distant, and average of two readings was recorded for all participants.

Data was collected from diabetic clinics of medical wards of Jinnah Post graduate Medical Center (JPMC) Karachi and analyzed by using SPSS version 23.0. Chi-square test and Pearson's correlation was used to determine the variables association with T2DM and T1DM. P<0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

The study sample comprised of 30 participants each in the control, type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes groups.

The study results showed that among the control group, systolic blood pressure level was not significantly correlated with any parameter of the lipid profile whereas the diastolic blood pressure level was significantly correlated only with the triglyceride level (ρ=-0.419, p=0.021), as shown in Table 1A and 1B.

Variables (n=30) Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
ρ P
Triglyceride (mg/dL) -0.289 0.121
LDL (mg/dL) -0.03 0.873
HDL (mg/dL) -0.226 0.23
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 0.177 0.349

Table 1A: Correlation between lipid profile and systolic blood pressure levels (Control).

Variables (n=30) Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
ρ P
Triglyceride (mg/dL) -0.419 0.021
LDL (mg/dL) -0.147 0.439
HDL (mg/dL) -0.202 0.284
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 0.313 0.092

Table 1B: Correlation between lipid profile and diastolic blood pressure levels (Control).

The study results further showed that among the type 1 diabetes group, both the systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were not significantly correlated with any parameter of the lipid profile, as shown in Table 2A and 2B.

Variables (n=30) Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
ρ p
Triglyceride (mg/dL) -0.002 0.993
LDL (mg/dL) -0.235 0.211
HDL (mg/dL) -0.132 0.486
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) -0.158 0.403

Table 2A: Correlation between lipid profile and systolic blood pressure levels (Type 1 Diabetics).

Variables (n=30) Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
ρ p
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 0.034 0.86
LDL (mg/dL) -0.189 0.316
HDL (mg/dL) -0.107 0.572
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) -0.244 0.193

Table 2B: Correlation between lipid profile and diastolic blood pressure levels (Type 1 Diabetics).

The study results also revealed that among the type 2 diabetes group, the systolic blood pressure level was significantly correlated only with the HDL level (ρ=0.454, p=0.012) whereas the diastolic blood pressure level was not significantly correlated with any parameter of the lipid profile, as shown in Table 3A and 3B.

Variables (n=30) Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
ρ p
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 0.065 0.735
LDL (mg/dL) -0.111 0.56
HDL (mg/dL) 0.454 0.012
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) -0.261 0.164

Table 3A: Correlation between lipid profile and systolic blood pressure levels (Type 2 Diabetics).

Variables (n=30) Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
ρ p
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 0.019 0.921
LDL (mg/dL) -0.156 0.411
HDL (mg/dL) 0.343 0.064
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) -0.278 0.137

Table 3B: Correlation between lipid profile and diastolic blood pressure levels (Type 2 Diabetics).

Discussion

Dyslipidemia in diabetes mellitus is related with atherosclerosis leads to develop coronary artery disease. This study demonstrated the association of lipid imbalance and blood pressure in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.

One of the studies conducted to find out the pattern of dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a rural medical college. The most frequently observed dyslipidemia in their study was hypertriglyceridemia that was reported in 56% cases, and low HDL was found in 52.9% cases [29] The present study showed the most commonly observed dyslipidaemia was low HDL that was significantly correlated with systolic blood pressure in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (ρ=0.454, p=0.012) although level of triglycerides were also raised but not at significant level.

Another observational cross sectional study investigated the relationship between blood glucose level and serum lipid profile, assuming that timely recognition of lipid abnormalities and early treatment can reduce the chances of atherogenic cardiovascular disorder and cerebrovascular catastrophe in T2DM patients. They also reported that significant correlation was found between HbA1c and serum levels of lipid profile such as TC, TG and HDL-C (p<0.05) while no significant correlation observed between HbA1c with LDL-C in T2DM patient [30]. The present study was consistent with the above reported study and revealed that significant correlation was observed between HDL-C and systolic blood pressure (ρ=0.454, p=0.012) in patients with T2DM while showed inconsistency as an insignificant correlation found with triglyceride, LDL and total cholesterol level.

Lipid abnormalities in Diabetes is frequently described by high Total Cholesterol, high Triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and raised LDL level [10,31]. It has been illustrated by the research in a rural population of Bangladesh that assessed serum lipid profile independently or in combined form along with their relationship with status of glucose intolerance in T2DM and prediabetes. Therefore, it was revealed that T2DM was significantly associated with high T-Chol level (p<0.001), low level of HDL-C (p=0.044), high Triglycerides (p<0.001) [31]. As far as the present study is concerned, significantly low level of HDL (ρ=0.454, p=0.012) was reported in lipid profile of patients with T2DM. Besides, Triglycerides (ρ=0.065, p=0.735) and TChol level (ρ= -0.261, p=0.164) had insignificant correlation with blood pressure in T2DM patients.

Another descriptive study determined the association of blood pressure with Non-HDL Cholesterol (Non-HDL.C) in type 2 diabetes patients. Their study reported that there was insignificant association observed between hypertension and Non-HDL.C in type 2 diabetes patients. On the other hand, the increased Non-HDL.C level in most of type 2 diabetic patients showed significant correlation with Total.C, Triglycerides and LDL.C requires its screening regardless of blood pressure status [32]. The present study was not in accordance with the above cited study and reported that systolic blood pressure had significant association with HDL (ρ=0.454, p=0.012) in T2DM whereas insignificant correlation with Total.C (ρ= -0.261, p=0.164), LDL.C (ρ= -0.111, p=0.56) and Triglycerides (ρ=0.065, p=0.735).

Likewise, another cross-sectional study evaluated the dyslipidemia in children and adolescents with T1DM and its association with other risk factors. The major dyslipidemic status was increased level of triglycerides in their study. Their study evidently supports that uncontrolled glycemic level as a probable modifiable risk factor for dyslipidemia [19]. Our study showed that high serum triglycerides levels significantly correlated with blood pressure level in control group (ρ=-0.419, p=0.012) reflecting the risk factor of progression of Diabetes type 1 and 2.

Despite the fact that, various studies reported that the most common dyslipidemia was high LDL, although high LDL was elevated in dyslipidemic group however it did not attain the statistical significant level (p=0.059) [33,34]. Similarly, one study reported positive association between HbA1c and serum lipid thereby presenting the proof of positive effect on serum lipid levels by controlling glycaemic level in children and adolescents [36]. Our study was inconsistent with the above reported studies and stated that most frequent dyslipidemia was low HDL with significant correlation (ρ=0.454, p=0.012) with blood pressure in T2DM patients.

Therefore, it is stated that lipid abnormalities is found commonly in type 1 and 2 diabetes patients and appears to be correlated with glycaemic control. Since it is a significant risk factor that is responsible for coronary heart disease and eventually associated with complication leads to morbidity rate and greater premature mortality, so timely assessment, prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia could avoid or reduce the chances of vascular damages.

Conclusion

This study concluded that systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in dyslipidemic patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, among them low HDL was commonly observed. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly correlated with Triglycerides level in control group. Furthermore, high LDL, low HDL, Triglyceride were insignificantly correlated with blood pressure in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Therefore, timely assessment, prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia could avoid or reduce the chances of vascular damages.

References

  1. Martín-Timón I, Sevillano-Collantes C, Segura-Galindo A, et al. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Have all risk factors the same strength?. World J Diabetes 2014; 5:444-470.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Roglic G, Unwin N, Bennett PH, et al. The burden of mortality attributable to diabetes: realistic estimates for the year 2000. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:2130-2135.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 94:311-21.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Meo SA, Zia I, Bukhari IA, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: Current prevalence and future forecast. J Pak Med Assoc 2016; 66:1637-1642.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Aronson D, Edelman ER. Coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Cardiol Clin 2014; 32:439–455.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Preis SR, Pencina MJ, Hwang SJ, et al. Trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus in the Framingham heart study. Circulation 2009; 120:212-20.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, et al. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:818-27.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Huang Y, Cai X, Mai W, et al. Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: Systemic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016; 355:i5953.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Mooradian AD. Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2009; 5:150-159.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Santos-Gallego CG, Rosenson RS. Role of HDL in those with diabetes. Curr Cardiol Rep 2014; 16:512.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  21. Gerber PA, Spirk D, Brändle M, et al. Regional differences of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Switzerland: a national cross-sectional survey. Swiss Med Wkly 2011; 141:w13218.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  23. Joshi SR, Anjana RM, Deepa M, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e96808.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  25. Zhu XW, Deng FY, Lei SF. Meta-analysis of atherogenic index of plasma and other lipid parameters in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Prim Care Diabetes 2015; 9:60-67.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  27. Lee JS, Chang PY, Zhang Y, et al. Triglyceride and HDL-C dyslipidemia and risks of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke by glycemic dysregulation status: The strong heart study. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:529-537.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  29. Rana JS, Liu JY, Moffet HH, et al. Metabolic dyslipidemia and risk of coronary heart disease in 28,318 adults with diabetes mellitus and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl. Am J Cardiol 2015; 116:1700-1704.
  30. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  31. Donaghue KC, Wadwa RP, Dimeglio LA, et al. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2014. Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15:257–269.
  32. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  33. Shamir R, Kassis H, Kaplan M, et al. Glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus improves lipid serum levels and oxidative stress. Pediatr Diabetes 2008; 9:104-109.
  34. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  35. Ladeia AM, Adan L, Couto-Silva AC, et al. Lipid profile correlates with glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Prev Cardiol 2006; 9:82-88.
  36. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  37. Zabeen B, Balsa AM, Islam N, et al. Lipid profile in relation to glycemic control in type 1 diabetes children and adolescents in bangladesh. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2018; 22:89-92.
  38. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  39. Kondeti VK, Badri KR, Maddirala DR, et al. Effect of pterocarpus santalinus bark, on blood glucose, serum lipids, plasma insulin and hepatic carbohydrate metabolic enzymes in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Food Chem Toxicol 2010; 48:1281-1287.
  40. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  41. Rajasekhar MD, Badri KR, Vinay Kumar K, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel antihyperglycemic protein from the fruits of Momordica cymbalaria. J Ethnopharmacol 2010; 128:58-62.
  42. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  43. Bell DA, Watts GF. Contemporary and novel therapeutic options for hypertriglyceridemia. Clin Ther 2015; 37:2732-50.
  44. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  45. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: Summary report. Pediatr 2011; 128:S213-256.
  46. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  47. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. American heart association statistics C, stroke statistics S: Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: A report from the american heart association. Circulation 2015; 131:e29-322.
  48. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  49. Millán J, Pintó X, Muñoz A, et al. Lipoprotein ratios: Physiological significance and clinical usefulness in cardiovascular prevention. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2009; 5:757-65.
  50. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  51. Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, et al. Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus: The framingham heart study. Circulation 2007; 115:1544-50.
  52. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  53. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: A collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 2010; 375:2215-2222.
  54. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  55. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. Br Med J 2000; 321:405-412.
  56. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  57. Subburam R, Manohar CR, Subramaniyam P, et al. Dyslipidaemia among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a rural hospital in Erode district, Tamilnadu. J Indian Med Assoc 2013; 111:10-13.
  58. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  59. Begum A, Irfan SR, Hoque MR, et al. Relationship between HbA1c and lipid profile seen in bangladeshi type 2 diabetes mellitus patients attending BIRDEM hospital: A cross-sectional study. Mymensingh Med J 2019; 28:91-95.
  60. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  61. Bhowmik B, Siddiquee T, Mujumder A, et al. Serum lipid profile and its association with diabetes and prediabetes in a rural bangladeshi population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15:1944.
  62. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  63. Zaka N, Gul N, Ishfaq N, et al. Association of hypertension with non-HDL cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020; 30:822-827.
  64. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  65. Homma TK, Endo CM, Saruhashi T, et al. Dyslipidemia in young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2015; 59:215-219.
  66. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  67. Rahma S, Rashid JA, Farage AH. The significance of lipid abnormalities in children with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Iraqi Postgrad Med J 2006; 5:289-94.
  68. Google Scholar

  69. Teles SA, Fornés NS. Relationship between anthropometric and biochemical profi les in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Rev Paul Pediatr 2012; 30:65-71.
  70. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Author Info

Sana Bilal1*, Uzma Raza2, Zia Ullah Khan3, Hamida Ghulam Hussain4, Aatkah Naseer5, Adeeba Salahuddin6, Tabassum Fatima7 and Muzainah Khan8

1Specialist Family medicine, Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, United Arab Emirates
2Department of Biochemistry, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Pakistan
3Department of Medicine, Sir Syed college of Medical Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
4Department of Gynaecology, Memon Medical Institution, Karachi, Pakistan
5Department of Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institution, Karachi, Pakistan
6Ziauddin University Hospital, Pakistan
7Department of Pharmacology, Karachi University, Pakistan
8Karachi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan
 

Received: 31-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-52877; , Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-52877 (PQ); Editor assigned: 01-Jan-2022, Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-52877 (PQ); Reviewed: 15-Feb-2022, QC No. JRMDS-22-52877; Revised: 18-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-52877 (R); Published: 25-Feb-2022

http://sacs17.amberton.edu/