Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research - (2019) Volume 7, Issue 4

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles as an Irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis In vitro Study

Batool M AL-Fhham and Aseel Haidar MJ AL-Haidar*

*Correspondence: Aseel Haidar MJ AL-Haidar, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq, Email:

Author info »


Background: Successful root canal therapy depends on thorough chemo mechanical debridement of pulpal tissue, dentin debris and infective microorganisms.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in reducing the bacterial infection of the root canals.

Materials and Methods: The root canals of 55 single-rooted teeth were cleaned, shaped, and sterilized. All the teeth samples were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis and incubated at 37°C for 2 weeks. Then, the teeth were divided into four groups. Group I (n=15): 100 ppm silver nanoparticles, Group II (n=15): 2.5 sodium hypochlorite, Group III (n=15): 2% chlorhexidine, IV (n=10): Normal saline as a control group. Specimens were incubated for 2 weeks. Paper points were used to obtain pre- and post-irrigation samples so that the colony-forming units were counted. Data were analyzed using SPSS and tested by Shapiro-Wilk test, One-Way ANOVA and Games-Howell test where the level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results: All the tested irrigants showed superior effectiveness compared to the normal saline (p<0.05). Overall, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite presented the most effective action against E. faecalis biofilm, followed by 100 ppm silver nanoparticles, then the 2% chlorhexidine by mean percentage of antibacterial effectiveness of 99.87%, 99.51% and 98.66% respectively.

Conclusions: Silver nanoparticles were effective against E. faecalis biofilm similarly to sodium hypochlorite when it was used as an irrigation solution.


Antibacterial, Chlorhexidine, Enterococcus faecalis, Silver nanoparticles, Sodium hypochlorite


Successful endodontic treatment depends upon various factors such as chemomechanical debridement, optimum irrigation, appropriate and specific intracanal medicaments and three-dimensional obturation in order to get a complete seal of the root canal system. The complicated anatomy of the root canal system permits the survival of microorganism after the completion of standard cleansing [1].

Enterococcus faecalis is a normal inhabitant of the oral flora, which is facultative anaerobic microorganism, Grampositive and related, most often, with the failure of the root canal treatment also as in several kinds of periradicular lesions including primary and secondary endodontic infections [2,3]. It is capable for extant within the harsh nutritional conditions and may keep viable as a one microorganism [4]. It has the ability of dentinal tubule penetration and biofilm formation [5].

Various irrigants at variable concentrations such as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) are used as an adjunct to conventional mechanical root canal cleaning methods [6]. However, root canal irrigants are only effective when they come in contact with the surface, and because of the anatomical barriers they cannot penetrate deep into the surfaces [7]. NaOCl able to penetrate the dentinal tubules into 130 mm, whereas bacteria able to penetrate into 1000 mm [8]. In addition, irrigation with sodium hypochlorite leads to decreased bond strength between dentin and resin [9]. As well as CHX has a lower ability to dissolve bacterial biofilms compared with sodium hypochlorite [10,11].

Due to this, the efforts of researchers in the endodontic field focused in developing a new nanomaterial-based irrigant [12].

Nanotechnology is considered to be a breakthrough in the field of medicine. It is helpful in manufacturing enhance biomaterials with distinctive physical, chemical and biological properties [13,14]. This is chiefly approached by enhancing surface-to-volume ratio. To regulate numerous biological processes, nanomaterials can be used with predefined geometries, surface characteristics and mechanical strength [15].

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are effective against several microorganisms including E. faecalis, their use in disinfection attributed to their optimum antibacterial properties. They possesses high surface area and positive charge density and polycationic/polyanionic properties that enhance the antibacterial effect [5,16]. It is suggested to use AgNP solution as an alternative to endodontic irrigating solution not just for its robust bactericidal activity but additionally for its biocompatibility, particularly in low concentrations [17].

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of Silver nanoparticles in reducing the bacterial infection in the root canal when used as an irrigant compared to sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine.

Materials and Methods

Teeth selection and preparation

Fifty-five single rooted permanent teeth, extracted for orthodontic reasons, were collected from children younger than fifteen years old. Teeth with root caries and canal calcifications were excluded from the study. Soft tissues, calculus and bone on the surfaces of the root were slightly removed by periodontal curette. Then placed in 5.25% NaOCl for 1 hour to disinfect the root surface after that the teeth stored in a normal saline [18]. Roots were cut at 14-mm distance from the apex employing diamond disc.

The working length was 13 mm (1 mm from the apical foramen). Preparation of the canals was done by the using of ProTaper rotary files (CICADA) up to F4. Then canals were irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl between the use of the rotary files, using a 5 ml syringe and endodontic needle. Once completion of the preparation, each canal were irrigated with 1 ml 17% EDTA, 5 ml normal saline and 1 ml NaOCl, respectively, each one for 3 minutes employing endodontic needle to get rid of the smear layer. Finally, all the canals were irrigated with 5 ml saline solution. The root surfaces were coated with 2 layers of a nail varnish after sealing the apical foramen with chemical-cure glass ionomer. Then the teeth were put in screw cup glasses and autoclaved for 30 minutes at 12°C with 15 IB [19].

Bacterial isolation

E. faecalis were isolated from the infected root canals. Several samples were taken from chronic infected roots that were suspected to be inhabitant with E. faecalis. Bile esculin test (selective test for E. faecalis) was used for the first identification of the bacteria where black deposit appears after 24 hours of the samples culturing [20]. Then E. faecalis were further detecting by Vitek 2 system for more accuracy [21].

Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles

AgNps was synthesized from (probiotic) of the bacillus mixture by adding Silver nitrate (AgNO3) to cell free supernatant that obtained from the centrifuge the incubated broth of bacillus, after that it incubated in shaker incubator and centrifuged, the supernatant was discarded and the deposit at the bottom of the tube which represent the collection of the nanoparticles. All the steps were done in dark condition to avoid oxidation of AgNO3 [22-24]. Characterization of the Ag Nanoparticles was analyzed using the ultraviolet (UV)- visible spectroscopy (Figure 1), Scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Figure 2), Atomic force microscope (AFM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). It has spherical shape and Avg. Diameter: 33.53 nm.


Figure 1. The UV-spectroscopy shows strong absorbance peak at 398 nm.


Figure 2. SEM Micrograph of silver nanoparticle synthesized by bacillus mixture.

A 24 hour pure culture of E. faecalis was suspended in 5 ml of brain/heart infusion broth (BHI), then it incubated for 4 hour at 37ºC [25]. The sterilized tooth specimens were inoculated with 2 ml of 0.5 Mc Farland solution of the bacterial suspension that was inject into each canal using sterile needle then incubated at 37°C [12]. Two weeks period was chosen for the inoculation of bacteria. All the microbiological procedures were done under the sterile environment in a laminar flow hood [26].

Antimicrobial activity of the irrigants

The teeth were removed from the screw cup glass aseptically, after incubation period, and gently rinsed with sterile saline to remove the culture medium. Then, a pre irrigation sample (S1) was obtained by sterilized #25-paper point applied into the root canal for 1 minute [27]. The samples were randomly divided into 4 groups for the experimental procedure of the irrigation materials.

Irrigation procedure

Group I (n=15): 5 ml of 100 ppm AgNPs was inserted into each root canal followed by irrigation with normal saline.

Group II (n=15): 5 ml of 2.5% NaOCl was used followed by irrigation with normal saline.

Group III (n=15): 5 ml of 2% CHX was irrigated into each root canal followed by irrigation with normal saline.

Group IV (n=10): root canals were irrigated with 5 ml of normal saline as a control group.

The irrigation time was 5 minutes. for each sample. Each solution was delivered into the canal lumen with sterile 5 ml plastic syringes and endodontic needles. The same operator performed all the irrigation procedures at room temperature under aseptic conditions [12].

Then bacteriological samples were obtained using sterile paper points (S2). Both the pre and the post sample were kept in Eppendorf tubes which containing 1 ml of normal saline and vortexed for 30 seconds each [27]. After that serial dilution were done. Then, each dilution were pipetted and cultured on blood agar plates and incubated for 24 hour at 37°C. The colony forming units (CFU) counted and calculated to give CFU/ml (Figure 3) [28].


Figure 3. The colony forming units that were grown on blood agar.

Then bacteriological samples were obtained using sterile paper points (S2). Both the pre and the post sample were kept in Eppendorf tubes which containing 1 ml of normal saline and vortexed for 30 seconds each [27]. After that serial dilution were done. Then, each dilution were pipetted and cultured on blood agar plates and incubated for 24 hour at 37°C. The colony forming units (CFU) counted and calculated to give CFU/ml (Figure 3) [28].


Table 1 showed that there was a reduction in the means of the post samples of the bacterial colonies for all the four methods, with the largest effect size was to the NAOCL group, followed by AgNps group then CHX group while the least effect size was to the normal saline group. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of each sample was calculated according to equation reported by Dunavant et al. [29]. Sodium hypochlorite showed the largest mean percentile of the antibacterial effectiveness followed by of silver nanoparticles then chlorhexidine while the lowest percentage was found for the normal saline (Table 2). A significant difference was found between the antibacterial efficacy of the four groups (p=0.000), as shown in Table 3.

Paired Samples Statistics Paired t- test p value Effect Size
Group Before After
Mean SE Mean SE
Saline 3996875 1303913.757 1673375 551261.371 2.959 0.01 0.764
Silver 7439916.667 2146129.158 8950 4317.062 3.46 0.004 0.97
NAOCL 4066166.667 1050299.408 750 433.013 3.87 0.002 0.999
CHX 5387500 1808611.235 34033.3 15709.337 3.067 0.013 0.893

Table 1: The paired samples statistics of effective size for pre and post Samples for all groups.

Groups N Mean ± SD ± SE Minimum Maximum
Saline 10 58.1445 3.3724 1.0664 53.8994 62.9723
Silver 15 99.514 1.0904 0.2815 95.9857 100
NAOCL 15 99.8702 0.2641 0.0682 99.0909 100
CHX 15 98.669 1.9202 0.4958 95.0456 100

Table 2: The antibacterial effectiveness of the four irrigant methods used in the study.

Groups Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 13901.906 3 4633.969 1377.241 0
Within Groups 171.598 51 3.365 - -
Total 14073.504 54 - - -
Levene Statistic=24.637, df=3, p=0.000

Table 3: Statistical test of Effect (One-Way ANOVA analysis) among irrigants.

However, the multiple comparisons between the groups by Games-Howell showed that there was a significant difference between the normal saline and the other three groups, p=0.000. While the comparison between Silver nanoparticles, NAOCL and CHX showed that there was no significant difference between them (Table 4).

Multiple Comparisons by Games-Howell
(I) Group (J) Group Mean Difference (I-J) Sig. 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Saline Silver -41.3694 0 -44.728 -38.0109
NAOCL -41.7256 0 -45.0561 -38.3951
CHX -40.5144 0 -43.9691 -37.0598
Silver NAOCL -0.3562 0.6182 -1.1871 0.4747
CHX 0.855 0.4545 -0.7272 2.4372
NAOCL CHX 1.2112 0.117 -0.2368 2.6591

Table 4: Comparison between the antibacterial effects of the irrigants methods.


Mechanical cleansing and irrigation with antimicrobial potential solutions is the essential steps for root canal disinfection [30]. Enterococcus faecalis is the predominant microorganism related to persistent periradicular lesions, which is occasionally detected as the sole microorganism in root canals of the teeth [31]. This microorganism has special virulence factors including cytolysin, lytic enzymes, aggregation substance, lipoteichoic acid, and pheromones [32]. E. faecalis is ready to invade dentinal tubules and stay viable inside the tubules for extend period of time resist the intracanal disinfectants [33]. Sodium hypochlorite is the most counseled root canal irrigant, attributed to its antimicrobial effectiveness and tissue dissolution capability [34]. Even so, the direct employing of sodium hypochlorite is potentially harmful as related to cellular destruction of the tissues [19,35]. To enhance the properties of the antibacterial agents utilized in endodontic treatment, innovative antimicrobial delivery systems had been developed, like nanoparticles [36]. Nanoparticles are outlined as particles with tiny sizes, massive surface/area mass ratio with external dimensions of 1 – 100 nm, and enhanced chemical reactivity [37,38]. The properties of nanoparticles as larger surface area and the charge density enable them to interact to a large degree with the negatively charged surface of the bacterial cells, leading to an increased antimicrobial activity [39]. Silver nanoparticles have the ability to attach and penetrate the cell walls of each Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, releasing silver ions that lead to disturbance in the cell function. Therefore, they are used for inhibition of the biofilm formation and treatment and prevention of drugresistant microorganisms [37]. Nanoparticles have additionally studied in the field of endodontic in an effort to improve root canal disinfection [40] by minimizing E. faecalis adherence to dentine and biofilm elimination [39,41]. The result of the present study, showed a highly antibacterial effectiveness of the three types of the irrigation solutions (sodium hypochlorite, silver nanoparticles and chlorhexidine) which were 99.87, 99.51, 98.66 respectively. However, there was a significance difference between them. Meanwhile, normal saline showed the least antimicrobial effect (58.14). The activity of silver nanoparticles in the elimination of E. faecalis that had been seen in this study was near that found with the use of NaOCl, and this result was in agreement with the findings of Luna et al. [12] who evaluated the effect of using AgNPs as a final irrigant on E. faecalis. They found a positive bactericidal effect from the AgNPs solution as an endodontic irrigation with the same effect occurred by using sodium hypochlorite at 2.25%, so that these nanoparticles were the good choice to get rid E. faecalis in the root canal treatment. In addition, the finding of the present study was in accordance with that found by other study done by Moghadas et al. [42]. They found that this nanosilverbased root canal irrigant was an effective agent for eradication of E. faecalis and S. aureus and there was no significant difference between NaOCl and the nanosilverbased irrigant, so as this in vitro study. Meanwhile, Afkhami et al. [19] also showed that AgNPs at 100 ppm concentration had an efficacy similar to the use of 2.5% NaOCl in the reduction of bacterial count. However, de Almeida et al. [43] demonstrated that AgNPs solutions had similar antimicrobial activity compared to the conventional endodontic irrigants (sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine) p>0.05. On the other hand, the results of the current study was in disagreement with other studies [44,45]. Wu et al. [44] highlighted that irrigation with 0.1% AgNP solution did not disrupt E. faecalis biofilm structure or produce significant killing of the resident biofilm bacteria. While Rodrigues et al. [45] demonstrated that the 94 ppm silver nanoparticle solution tested was not effective in disrupting E. faecalis biofilm when compared with NaOCl and the AgNP solution was significantly less effective (p<0.05) than chlorhexidine in killing bacteria in biofilms when irrigated for 5 min. The explanation for this disparity in the results may be related to the differences in the methodology used and variance in the microbial strains that had been tested.


Silver nanoparticles were effective as 2.5% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine against E. faecalis, so it can be used as an alternative to the NaOCl. Further in vitro and in vivo studies are essential to validate the use of Silver nanoparticles as an irrigant against E. faecalis.


Author Info

Batool M AL-Fhham and Aseel Haidar MJ AL-Haidar*

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq

Citation: Batool M ALfhham, Aseel Haidar MJ AL-Haidar, Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles as an Irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis In vitro Study, J Res Med Dent Sci, 2019, 7(4): 21-27.

Received Date: Jul 27, 2019 / Accepted Date: Aug 20, 2019 /