Management of Liver Abscess

Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 8

Management of Liver Abscess

Shubham Khanolkar and Meenakshi Yeola*

*Correspondence: Meenakshi Yeola, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, India, Email:

Author info »


Hepatic abscess are indeed a common source of morbidity and mortality in developed and underdeveloped countries due to parasite or infectious diseases (LMIC). The pathogenesis of abscess varies based on the origin, necessitating distinct diagnostic & therapeutic techniques. Pathogenesis and demography of abscesses, as well as the existing diagnostics technique as well as its shortcomings, as well as the treatment of hepatic abscess for reduced situations, are described in this article. Peritonitis caused by rupture of abdomen intestinal materials plus eventual spreading towards the hepatic through the hepatic portal vein or immediate dissemination in the context of bile disease are by far the commonest causes of acute bacterial hepatic abscess. It could also be caused by severe infections and vascular hematogenous implantation. Developments in screening and treatment techniques, as well as post - operative care, have lowered the short life expectancy dramatically. Initial detection and good and rapid therapy are linked to lower survival rates. According to the aetiology origin, hepatic abscess can be divided into 2 categories: pyogenic and amoebic. Abscesses can be amoebic, pyogenic (the most frequent), parasitic, or fungal. The majority of amoebic diseases are caused by Entamoebahistolytica. Pyogenic abscesses are polymicrobial in nature; however they are primarily populated by E. coli, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and anaerobic bacteria. Despite the rarity of these abscesses, it is crucial to assess their seriousness because neglected individuals get a high mortality risk. The much more frequent pattern of abscess formation is bowel spilling into the abdominal, which then travels through the hepatic venous system to the liver parenchyma.


Hepatic abscess, Pyogenic, Peritonitis.


A hepatic abscess is a pus-filled lesion in the hepatic system which can form as a result of a liver damage or an intraabdominal infection that has spread through the portal circulation [1]. Abscess can be classified as amoebic, pyogenic (most common), parasitic and fungi. Entamoebahistolytica causes most of the amoebic illnesses. Pyogenic abscess are generally polymicrobial, however particular microbes, such as E. coli, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and anaerobic bacteria are mostly present in them. Despite the low occurrence, it is critical to evaluate the severity of these abscesses since untreated patients have a significant death rate [2]. The most common pattern of abscess development is leaking through abdomen that is intestine, which traverse through the hepatic vein to the liver. An inflamed biliary tract in many cases develops an abscess by direct contact. Abscesses of the liver are categorized in much number of ways: First is based on the location in hepatic system. The lobe of liver that accounts for greater blood supply that is right lobe accounts for half of all solitary liver abscesses, while the other two lobes are less prevalent. Other approach is to think about the source: The major amount of liver abscess is divided into bacterial including amoebic and parasites if the aetiology is infectious (including hydatiform cyst). Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA), a puss filled inflammation of such liver parenchyma which emerge as a result of biliary tracts infections at about 40percentage points of cases, is still a deadly condition [3]. The aetiology of Pyogenic Liver Abscess have lately evolved from intraabdominal diseases like acute appendicitis and traumas into biliary tracts pathologic diseases; nonetheless, up to fifty five percent of people with Pyogenic Liver Abscess have no identifiable potential risks, which are referred to as cryptogenic instances [4-6].


The most common cause of a liver abscess used to be appendicitis, but this has dropped to fewer than 10% as improved diagnosis and therapy of the condition became accessible. The commonest causes of puss filled liver abscesses nowadays are biliary tracts illness (biliary stones, strictures, malignancy, and congenital abnormalities). Cholangitis causes half of all bacterial infections. Hepatic artery infection, portal venous infection, diverticular inflammation, cholecystic infection or trauma that penetrates is less common causes [7]. Some of them may have a cryptogenic origin. E.coli, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and anaerobes are the most frequent species, although they are all multi-microbial. If streptococcus orstapylococcus is the only infection found, the attention should shift to identifying a different cause of infective aetiology that has migrated to the hepatic system hematogenous. In Southeast Asia, Klebsiella pneumoniae is a common cause, and it's considered to be linked to or connected with colorectal cancer there as well [8]. If the cause is an anaerobe, E. histolyticas are the most frequent microbes. It leads to an amoebic hepatic abscess by eventually causing amoebic colitic infection, then infecting the hepatic venous system and proceeding to the hepatic parenchyma. Although it is uncommon in the United States, it is nevertheless detected among immigrants and international visitors.

Echinococcus granulosus, a parasitic organism that produces a hydatiform cystic lesion in the livers parenchyma, is another uncommon but essential parasitic pathogen. The meta cestode's phase of the parasite Echinococcus, which belongs to the Taenidaee family, causes infection. Abdominal discomfort, diarrhoea, and hepatomegaly are common symptoms in patients. Hydatiform cystic lesion is acquired from canine species and would nevertheless take a long time for the host to develop symptoms. The majority of instances are uncovered late in the game and by chance [9].

Pathogenesis of liver abscess

Hepatic abscess is an accumulation of pus containing a high amount of inflammatory cellular structures, particularly neutrophilia WBC, as well as tissue debris. Infection is linked to necrosis caused by inflammation in the surrounding tissue [10]. When to describe the pathological mechanism induced by E. histolyticas in the hepatic parenchyma, the term abscess may be misleading. Hepatocyte cell death occurs as a result of ALA, either by apoptosis or necrosis [11-13]. The absence of inflammatory cells is thought to be owing to the protozoan's lysis of neutrophils, resulting in the commonly reported non puss producing “anchovy material" abscess [14]. As even the abscesses grow bigger, apoptosis will persist till the client gets correct treatment. Proinflammatory lymphocytes, predominantly mononuclear cells, encircled & destroyed E. histolyticas quickly once it was planted in the hepatic cells, according to a rat study. The mesodermal, ectodermal, and endodermal tissues make up human gastrointestinal system. This tube's lining is made up of endoderm. The dorsal mesentery is formed when the posterior splanchanic blood vessels merge. The ventral mesenteric part is formed when anterior splanchnic arteries merge. The transverse septum is where the liver develops. Heapticparenchyma is still connected to the front abdominal wall.

The liver is particularly vulnerable to diseases and pus containing cavities via blood circulation because it gets blood from both the systemic and portal circulations [15]. Apart from this danger towards hepatic parenchyma is its proximity to the gall bladder. Contrary to this because the Kuffer cell’s that protect the parenchyma, infections and abscesses development wouldn’t occur as frequently or fast as predicted. Leakage of the contents of the bowel and peritoneal infection are most common pathologies for pyogenic liver abscesses. Bacteria enter the hepatic system through the portal venous system and remain there. The biliary system would potentially be the source of infection. Hematogenous spread is another possible cause.


The annual incidence rate is around 2 cases per one lakh people. Men are more affected than women [16]. Every type of abscesses that forms is determined by one's age. People in their 40s and 60s are more prone to develop a non-traumatic hepatic abscesses. There have been several reports of pyogenic liver abscesses. According to Abbas, et al. pyogenic aetiology was found in 56 of 67 patients hospitalized in the Middle Eastern areas for hepatic abscesses, with K. pneumoniae being the most frequent [17]. Males accounted for 61 of the cases. Taiwan appears to have a high incidence rate (seventeen per one lakh) [18]. Liver abscess accounts for most of the internal abscess and thirteen percent of abdominal abscess [19].

Hepatic abscess are found all over the world, although the frequency varies greatly across countries, with more over 1,000 incidents in Asiatic regions compared to only 23 occurrences in non-Asiatic countries during the same period. In the United States, PLA has a prevalence of 2.3 per 100 000 people, with diabetics and malignancy being risk factors for the disease. The most common infective agent identified in this setting was Streptococcus milleri, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae. In South Korea and Taiwan, however, Klebsiella pneumonia is the commonest infection seen in PLA [20-23].

Amoebiasis (gastrointestinal infection) is due to the parasite entamoeba H., which is most prevalent causative factor of intestinal parasite infection among returning travelers. Entamoebahistolytica is found all over the world, with infection rates higher in low & middle income country (LMICs) than in high income countries (HIC). Furthermore, a large percentage of HIC cases are imported, whereas non-imported instances generally affect immunocompromised individuals. Infections are connected to filthy living quarters and contaminated water. The overall prevalence of Amoebiasis among Thai- Cambodian border immigrants throughout 1986 and 1988 is a good example of this [24-26]. The most frequent extra intestinal symptom is a liver abscess, which occurs when the protozoans invade portal vein and migrates to the hepatic parenchyma. The illness is most common in Asian continent; here rates 22 per one lakh people/ year can be found [27]. ALA mostly affects males in their forties and fifties (30–60 years old). Consumption of alcoholic beverages and malnutrition are also risk factors (low body mass and hypoalbuminemia) [28].


To ascertain source of the participant's major ailment and verify or exclude a hepatic abscesses, get lab and diagnostics proof. A full blood count with differential, test results for hepatocellular injuries (liver enzyme that are generally raised in 50 % of patients), hepatic synthesizing function tests (Prealbumin and INR), ALP(elevated in around 90% of patients), C-reactive protein, esr, and serology to exclude out bacteremia seem to be just a few of the lab tests available [29].

A feces testing or serological tests for E. histolytica must be performed even when an amoebic abscesses is anticipated (just like in inhabitants or travelers visiting East Asia, African, as well as other regions around the world). The hydatiorm cyst necessitates echinococcus serologic pattern. The ELISA appears to be among the most sensitive and specific diagnostic test for Echinococcus (ELISA). Aftermath of the very first ELISA screenings, confirmation test employing immuno electrophoresis and immunoassays is necessary. The cysts dimensions decide whether or not a patient is serologically affirmative. In hepatic and bony cysts, serologic testing is affirmative, and not in lungs, brains, ocular, spleen, or calcification nodules.

There seem to be a variety of radiography procedures that could be performed, so several can be emphasized. It is indeed vital to limit a participant's radioactivity exposure and screening that isn't necessary. On a thoracic x-ray, a right-sided elevated hemi-diaphragm and pleural effusion well above hepatic system may suggest this diagnostic. Very first diagnostics of selection is indeed an abdomen ultrasound (US), that shows hyper or hypo -echoic abnormalities with rare debris or spectating. A CT scan is indeed the following step that is super sensitive. While extremely specific, rim enlargement and edoema are rare indications of disease. The Ultrasound or Computerized tomography is accompanied by needle aspirational tech under monitoring to discover [30]. The technetium scanning, that has a sensitivities of 80percentage points for gallium and 90percent of the total for indium, is yet a different low-sensitivity diagnostic (less than CT) [31,32].

The direct aspirate should be used to obtain stains and cultures. Drains that are already in place will get polluted with skin flora, making them unfit for cultural purposes. Aerobes and anaerobes should be stained and cultured (special handling may be required), although fungi, Mycobacterium, Entamoebahistolytica, and parasites may require more specialized cultures. When there are cystic or solid regions in the liver, aspiration yields fluid with positive cultures, the diagnosis is established. Because of the high complication risk if left untreated, it's critical to have these tests and start treatment as soon as possible. Ultrasounds & CT scanning is essential tool for demonstrating a room occupying lesions and confirming the existence or lack of something like a hepatic abscess, but they might not even be able to consistently distinguish amongst PLA & ALA [33]. ALA frequently found as a solitary lesions in the right sided lobe, or it could be found in the left sided lobe and could be numerous [34]. Computed tomography provides a better sensitivity (ninety percent sensitive) at detecting hepatic abscesses than ultrasonography (85 percent sensitive) [35], albeit this technique was not always available in an LMIC scenario.

The yardstick for diagnosing PLA is FNAC for cultures. Because parasitic cultivation is imprecise and therefore not frequently accessible in labs, that's not the situation with ALA. Even Microscopic TECHNIQUE is insensitive, as trophozoite is only found in about 25percentage points of instances [1]. This aspirate's macroscopic appearance could reveal significant basic description of the abscesses. ALA is colorless, mocha, and viscous, and therefore is frequently alluded as the anchovy paste, whereas PLA is pus producing and malodourous especially when caused by anaerobic bacterial infection. Even if it might be beneficial, it significance in distinction as diagnostic purposes is unknown.

Blood culturing are a key part of diagnosing an acute bacterial abscesses, and while their output is generally smaller than that of a pus aspirate from an abscess, it can give useful info to patients before they obtain treatments or have their abscess aspirated. Upon admission, any person suspected of having a hepatic abscess should have a serology taken [1].

Serologic testing could be helpful in returning travelers who've already been in high-endemicity places but now live in reduced endemicity locations. This is of limited use in higher endemic areas situations when individuals might be previously exposed due to the prolonged positive post contamination [36]. Inside the diagnosis of acute illness, the testing can sometimes be mistakenly negative, Taking into consideration the patient’s immune response, the type of serologic test or the pathogenic strain [36].

In LMICs, antigenic screening could be beneficial. This Tech Lab E. histolytica II Antigen Detection test identifies Gal/GalNAc antigen in blood and therefore is extremely sensitive (95%) and precise (100%) (n=70 controls, including nine PLA) [36]. Individuals that have now been given metronidazole before use had considerably lower sensitivity. Antigen detection testing's affordability may potentially be a possible impediment to its use in LMICs.

Some other future alternative indicator in the shape of a horizontal flow assay, pyruvate phosphate dikinase, has shown promise in the identification of ALA. Since many ALA sufferers have had no gastrointestinal symptoms, feces screening for eggs and parasites, as well as antigenic tests, is ineffective and therefore not indicated. As just a result, feces screening has very little actual utility in the identification of an abscess.

Again for identification of ALA, molecular testing of the material of the liver abscess is reliable [37,38]. Even though this technique has the potential to properly diagnose Entamoeba disease, its use in LMICs is reduced due to the need for specialized tools and expensive supplies.

Culture - positive, Entamoeba serological tests, hepatic abscess sample was withdrawn for cultures and genetic and antigenic analysis are among of the diagnostic techniques used in HIC to ascertain the source of liver abscess. In a low-income country, each of these choices is tested. Given the limited screening potential, a person would then normally present after refusing to adhere to preliminary antimicrobial prophylaxis, imagery uncovers an abscess, as well as the consequence stays indistinct. LMICs have neither necessary microbiological treatments, nor when they do exist, use is generally terrible [39]. If the therapeutic circumstances allow, sample collecting must be done before starting medications; nevertheless, in LMICs, sample gathering is commonly done later and therefore is reserved solely for patients who have failed to react to antibiotic prophylaxis. In LMICs, where it would be common for children to get prescription through pharmacists or clinics before to hospitalization (50 percent of all trades in Asia) [40,41], this covers a broad range of medications, particularly antimicrobial drugs [42]. People prefer to receive drugs through pharmacies for a myriad of purposes, such convenience, the ability to buy medicines in tiny amounts, and acquaintance with dispensers [42]. Lack of experience of pharmacy workers results in limitations in terms of expertise and product offerings. This is acknowledged as pharmaceutical distribution is not adequately regulated, leading in unregulated administration [43].


The therapy consists of draining the abscesses &administering antibiotics. Evacuation is required and could be accomplished beneath the Ultrasound or Computed tomography. With abscesses just under 5 cm, needles suction (sometimes frequently) could be sufficient, however if the size is greater than just that, a catheterization insertion may be necessary [44,45]. For abscess greater than 5 cm, interventional evacuation by stent implantation is usually the much more good approach. Sometimes, endoscopic evacuation is employed. Peritonitis, thick-walled abscess, burst abscesses, several big abscesses, and unsuccessful evacuation procedures all should be treated with surgery. A trans-peritoneal technique or a rear transpleural method is used to execute a surgery. The methodology empties the pus and enables again for examination of previously undiagnosed ulceration, whilst the last one is preferable for lesions in the back. A effective therapeutic approach is affected by the characteristics, position, & phase of the tumour. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) outflow may be utilized if prior bile operations have indeed been performed [46]. Sepsis, peritonitis, and empyema can all result from untreated hepatic abscess. Whenever the microorganism is unidentified, empirical antimicrobial treatment is required. Enterococci, anaerobic organisms, streptococcus pneumoniae, enterococcus, and Entamoebahistolytica must all be covered by antibiotic. Cephalosporins + metronidazole, Beta-Lactamase blocker + metronidazole, & synthesized beta-lactams+aminoglycosides & metronidazole are examples of these antimicrobial regimes. In the event of sensitivity or shortage, fluoroquinoles as well as carbapenems could be used instead of cephalosporins or beta - lactams. Entamoebahistolytica must be treated with metronidazole. This length of therapy varies, but it normally lasts between two and six weeks. In most situations, following early effectiveness of healthcare, the oral regimen could be employed to finish the programme successfully. Because the findings of the culture help pare down the microorganism, empirical therapy isn't any longer appropriate, since it could develop to resistance to antibiotic. Anaerobic bacteria are difficult to grow, therefore it may need to be managed experimentally over the full program. Antibiotics might be administered after -drainage to boost cultured output enabling real therapy in control subjects. In immunocompromised individuals suffering of persistent diffuse fungemia, initial antifungal therapy is critical. Antibiotic may be given simply for therapy if indeed the individual is still too unwell for evacuation, but this is a less desired option [47-52].

If Echinococcii is the cause, therapy includes benzimidazoles like albendazole. This treatment would go on for generations. Whereas the percent of reported are straightforward and could be handled with just an antiparasitic medicine, difficult cases require special attention. Evacuation is required in the majority of difficult instances. Doctors should tread cautiously when injecting hydatiform cysts prior to actually emptying these, even as burst might quickly put the person under crisis. In a research by Abbas, patients having pyogenic hepatic abscess spent a total of 13.6 days of treatment. Antimicrobial therapy lasted typically 34.7 nights for individuals. Another of the patients passed away. Individuals having amoebic hepatic abscess, on either arm, might have an average hospitalization of 7.7 day as well as a median duration of therapy of 11.8 day, including all cases being healed [47].


  1. Mischnik A, Kern WV, Thimme R. Pyogenic liver abscess: Changes of organisms and consequences for diagnosis and therapy. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 2017; 142:1067-1074.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Czerwonko ME, Huespe P, Bertone S, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: Current status and predictive factors for recurrence and mortality of first episodes. HPB 2016; 18:1023-1030.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Rahimian J, Wilson T, Oram V, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: Recent trends in etiology and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39:1654-1659.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Malik AA, Bari SU, Rouf KA, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: Changing patterns in approach. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2:395–401.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Kuo SH, Lee YT, Li CR, et al. Mortality in emergency department sepsis score as a prognostic indicator in patients with pyogenic liver abscess. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31:916–921.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Huang CJ, Pitt HA, Lipsett PA, et al. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. Changing trends over 42 years. Ann Surg 1996; 223:600–605.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Lardière-Deguelte S, Ragot E, Amroun K, et al. Hepatic abscess: Diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg 2015; 152:231-243.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Lai HC, Lin CC, Cheng KS, et al. Increased incidence of gastrointestinal cancers among patients with pyogenic liver abscess: A population-based cohort study. Gastroenterol 2014; 146:129-137.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Qu K, Liu C, Wang ZX, et al. Pyogenic liver abscesses associated with nonmetastatic colorectal cancers: An increasing problem in Eastern Asia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:2948.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Thevenet PS, Alvarez HM, Torrecillas C, et al. Dispersion of Echinococcus granulosus eggs from infected dogs under natural conditions in Patagonia, Argentina. J Helminthol 2020; 94.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  21. Andrade-Filho JD. Analogies in medicine: Anchovy paste in the liver. Revista Instituto Medicina Tropical São Paulo 2012; 54:234.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  23. Prakash V, Oliver TI. Amoebic liver abscess. In: Abai B, Abu-Ghosh A, AcharyaAB, et al. Florida: Stat Pearls Publishing, 2019.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  25. Wuerz T, Kane JB, Boggild AK. A review of amoebic liver abscess for clinicians in a nonendemic setting. Can J Gastroenterol 2012; 26:729–733.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  27. Tsutsumi V, Mena-Lopez R, Anaya-Velazquez F, et al. Cellular bases of experimental amoebic liver abscess. Am J Pathol1984; 117:81–91.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  29. Sifri CD, Madoff LC. Infections of the liver and biliary system (liver abscess, cholangitis, cholecystitis). In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th Edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2015; 1270–1279.
  30. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  31. Hau T, Haaga JR, Aeder MI. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of abdominal abscesses. Curr Probl Surg 1984; 21:8.
  32. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  33. Kaplan GG, Gregson DB, Laupland KB. Population-based study of the epidemiology of and the risk factors for pyogenic liver abscess. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:1032-1038.
  34. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  35. Abbas MT, Khan FY, Muhsin SA, et al. Epidemiology, clinical features and outcome of liver abscess: A single reference center experience in Qatar. Oman Med J 2014; 29:260-263.
  36. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  37. Tsai FC, Huang YT, Chang LY, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess as endemic disease, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14:1592-1600.
  38. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  39. Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Fullen WD, et al. Intra-abdominal abscesses. Am J Surg 1973; 125:70-79.
  40. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  41. Sifri CD, Madoff LC. Infections of the liver and biliary system (liver abscess, cholangitis, cholecystitis). In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th Edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders 2015; 1270.
  42. Ko WC, Paterson DL, Sagnimeni AJ, et al. Community-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: Global differences in clinical patterns. Emerg Inf Dis 2002; 8:160–166.
  43. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  44. Kaplan GG, Gregson DB, Laupland KB. Population-based study of the epidemiology of and the risk factors for pyogenic liver abscess. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:1032–1038.
  45. Chung D, Lee S, Lee H, et al. Emerging invasive liver abscess caused by K1 serotype Klebsiella pneumoniae in Korea. J Inf 2007; 54:578–83.
  46. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  47. Herbinger K, Fleischmann E, Weber C, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic data on intestinal infections with Entamoebahistolytica and Entamoebadispar among returning travelers. Infection 2011; 39:527–535.
  48. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  49. Seeto RK, Rockey DC. Amoebic liver abscess: Epidemiology, clinical features, and outcome. West J Med 1999; 170:104–9.
  50. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  51. Candler W, Phuphaisan S, Echeverria P, et al. Amebiasis at an evacuation site on the Thai-Cambodian border. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1990; 21:574–579.
  52. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  53. Blessmann J, Van LP, Nu PAT, et al. Epidemiology of amebiasis in a region of high incidence of amoebic liver abscess in central Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2002; 66:578–583.
  54. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  55. Priyadarshi RN, Prakash V, Anand U, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage of various types of ruptured amoebic liver abscess: A report of 117 cases from a highly endemic zone of India. Abdom Radiol 2018; 44:877–885.
  56. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  57. Rahimian J, Wilson T, Oram V, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: Recent trends in etiology and mortality. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1654-1659.
  58. Ahn SJ, Kim JH, Lee SM, et al. CT reconstruction algorithms affect histogram and texture analysis: evidence for liver parenchyma, focal solid liver lesions, and renal cysts. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:4008-4015.
  59. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  60. Rassam F, Cieslak KP, Beuers UHW, et al. Stress test of liver function using technetium-99m-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40:388-392.
  61. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  62. van der Velden S, Dietze MMA, Viergever MA, et al. Fast technetium-99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry. Med Phys 2019; 46:345-355.
  63. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  64. Haque R, Mollah NU, Ali IM, et al. Diagnosis of amoebic liver abscess and intestinal infection with the Tech Lab Entamoebahistolytica II antigen detection and antibody test. J ClinMicrobiol 2000;3 8:3235.
  65. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  66. Sifri CD, Madoff LC. Infections of the liver and biliary system (liver abscess, cholangitis, cholecystitis). In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 8th Edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2015; 1270.
  67. Bächler P, Baladron MJ, Menias C, et al. Multimodality imaging of liver infections: Differential diagnosis and potential pitfalls. Gastrointest Imag 2016; 36:1001–1023.
  68. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  69. Otto MP, Gérôme P, Rapp C, et al. False-negative serologies in amoebic liver abscess: Report of two cases. J Travel Med 2013; 20:131–133.
  70. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  71. Syazwan S, Muhammad HY, Dyana ZN, et al. Production of recombinant Entamoebahistolytica pyruvate phosphate dikinase and its application in a lateral flow dipstick test for amoebic liver abscess. Br Med J Inf Dis 2014; 14:1–9.
  72. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  73. Krishna K, Subhash P. A novel tested multiplex polymerase chainreaction (PCR) assay for differential detection of Entamoebahistolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar DNA in stool sample. Br Med ClinMicrobiol 2007; 7:1–9.
  74. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  75. Om C, Daily F, Vlieghe E, et al. ‘If it’s a broad spectrum, it can shoot better’: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in Cambodia. Antimicrob Resist InfCont 2016; 5:1–8.
  76. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  77. Smith F. Private local pharmacies in low and middle-income countries: A review of interventions to enhance their role in public health. Trop Med Int Health 2009;14:362–72.
  78. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  79. Rosalind M, Catherine G. Performance of retail pharmacies in low- and middle-income Asian settings: A systematic review. Health Pol Plan 2016; 31:940–9 53.
  80. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  81. Minh P, Huong D, Byrkit R, et al. Strengthening pharmacy practice in Vietnam: Findings of a training intervention study. Trop Med Int Health 2013; 18:426–34.
  82. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  83. Stenson B, Syhakhang L, Lundborg C, et al. Real world pharmacy: Assessing the quality of private pharmacy practice in the lao people’s democratic republic. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001; 17:579–589.
  84. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  85. Zerem E, Hadzic A. Sonographically guided percutaneous catheter drainage versus needle aspiration in the management of pyogenic liver abscess. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189:138-142.
  86. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  87. Yu SC, Lo RH, Kan PS, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: Treatment with needle aspiration. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:912-916.
  88. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  89. Cai YL, Xiong XZ, Lu J, et al. Percutaneous needle aspiration versus catheter drainage in the management of liver abscess: A systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 2015; 17:195-201.
  90. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  91. Sersté T, Bourgeois N, Eynden FV, et al. Endoscopic drainage of pyogenic liver abscesses with suspected biliary origin. Official J Ame College Gastroenterol 2007; 102:1209-1215.
  92. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  93. Andhale A, Acharya S, Gupte Y, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess with reactive thrombocytosis-A rare case report. Med Sci 2020; 24:2126-2130.
  94. Google Scholar

  95. Andhale A, Acharya S, Pratapa S, et al. Acute liver failure and intravascular haemolysis in zinc phosphide poisoning. Blood 2020; 2:4.
  96. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  97. Arya S, Deshpande H, Belwal S, et al. Association between cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmias and chronic liver diseases: A narrative review. Trends Anaesth Critical Care 2020; 32:4-12.
  98. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  99. Garg RP, Agrawal A, Bhake AS, et al. Correlation study of coagulation profile in spectrum of liver diseases. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2020; 9:549-555.
  100. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Author Info

Shubham Khanolkar and Meenakshi Yeola*

Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi, Wardha, India

Received: 23-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. jrmds-22-70056; , Pre QC No. jrmds-22-70056(PQ); Editor assigned: 25-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. jrmds-22-70056(PQ); Reviewed: 08-Aug-2022, QC No. jrmds-22-70056; Revised: 12-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. jrmds-22-70056(R); Published: 19-Aug-2022