GET THE APP

Postoperative Complications Following Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia of Pediatric Patients: A Review

Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Review - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 3

Postoperative Complications Following Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia of Pediatric Patients: A Review

Shahad S Alkhuwaiter*

*Correspondence: Shahad S Alkhuwaiter, Department of Orthodontic and Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Introduction: General anesthesia is an advanced behavior guidance technique indicated for some pediatric dental patients to provide a safe and high-quality dental treatment. However, systemic and dental risks following the treatment are questionable. No available reviews outline the complications following the dental treatment among pediatric patients and how to reduce its incidence afterward. Aims: This review aimed to assess the reported postoperative complications among healthy pediatric patients (ASA I or II) following dental treatment under general anesthesia and recommendations to reduce the incidence and severity of these complications postoperatively. Methods: A review of the literature on postoperative complications following dental treatment under general anesthesia was conducted. Published articles addressing the type, frequency, and severity of the postoperative complications among healthy pediatric dental patients were assessed. Results:In general, the results of this review indicated that the complications are mild to moderate in severity and no severe complications were documented. Also, the majority can be easily managed and most importantly could be avoided before its occurrence. Conclusion:This review helps to predict the most common complications following dental treatment of healthy pediatric patients under general anesthesia and recommendations to minimize the morbidity postoperatively.

Keywords

General anesthesia, Pediatric, Complications, Postoperative, Dental treatment

Introduction

In pediatric dentistry, advanced behavior guidance technique sometimes is the best treatment strategy for patients who has severe disruptive behavior or who lack cooperative ability due to phycological, physical, or medical disorders. Indicated also to obtain good pain control when local anesthesia cannot be achieved. And in cases, advanced and comprehensive surgical or dental treatment is required. General anesthesia is advantageous also for providing safe and high-quality dental treatment. At the same time, eliminate the pain, child reaction with the dental treatment, and maintain the psychological health of the child [1].

On the other hand, providing dental treatment under general anesthesia includes some risks. And many studies were done to evaluate the safety of providing dental treatment under general anesthesia. In general, the reported postoperative complications are mild to moderate in severity and it does not require hospitalization for further management [2-5]. However, severe complications and death are very rare, especially among healthy children [6]. Mortality risk among pediatric dental patients assessed over a period of 10 years and more than 22,000 cases, the results confirmed that the dental treatment can be safely provided under general anesthesia since there were no deaths reported [7].

Previous studies had reported different types and numbers of dental procedures that are associated with postoperative discomfort. One study found that early discomfort in young children after general anesthesia was related to the placement of space maintainers and crowns but not associated with the extractions [8]. Mayeda and Wilson concluded that the placement of stainless steel crowns was related to the most severe complaint [9]. In some studies, extraction was the most dental procedure that is likely to cause pain postoperatively [10-13]. On the other hand, there was no association between the performed dental treatment and the postoperative discomfort in other reports [4,5].

The range and type of complications among the previous studies are variable due to the different study designs, measures, age and number of participants, recording time of complaints, confounding variables and statistics used, procedure complexity and duration, using of local anesthesia, an analgesic used intraoperatively at the end of the procedure or in the recovery room, and the overall differences in general anesthesia protocol used. Some studies reported the complaints immediately postoperative, others reported within 24 to 72 hours. The overall reported morbidities after treatment under general anesthesia of physically and mentally healthy pediatric dental patient ranges from 5% and up to 94.86% [3,4,9,11,14,15]. Generally, the frequency and severity of the complications are usually within the first 24 hours postoperatively, and then it reduced significantly after 72 hours [4,16].

Factors that were associated with postoperative complications include but are not limited to: age of the patient, medical status, provided dental treatment, provider experience, premedication used, total anesthetic time, intubation difficulty, and anesthetic agents used [2,16-21]. Previous studies found a relationship between preoperative dental anxiety with the postoperative morbidity. Children with increased dental anxiety tend to have more adverse events postoperatively [14,22]. In addition, Costa et al. had hevaluated the factors that could be related to the postoperative discomfort in young children, they found that the discomfort was mild and only of short duration after dental treatment under general anesthesia. This might be due to the use of intraoperative analgesia in their study. Factors that were found to be associated with the discomfort were; children who reported more discomfort preoperatively tend to have more discomfort after the treatment, it is most likely because the more invasive dental procedures are usually performed in a patient with a higher dental discomfort questionnaire score (DDQ-8). Another important factor that is reported in this study was the sleep length in the recovery room, children who slept longer time postoperatively feel more comfortable compared to those who slept shorter times. And finally, those who returned to a normal diet on the same day of the surgery reported fewer discomfort scores postoperatively [8].

All the possible postoperative morbidities should be explained clearly to the patient’s parents or caregivers before the procedure and how to deal with these complications if it happens. The American Society of Anesthesiologists recommends periodic assessment and monitoring of the patient postoperatively. Including evaluation of vital signs along with temperature, pain, nausea and vomiting, bleeding, and hydration. And this is beneficial for the early detection of complications and reduces the possibility of adverse outcomes [23]. Up to date, few studies recorded the complications after treatment under general anesthesia and no review article was done previously to outline the most common complications observed among pediatric dental patients. This is beneficial for predicting the common complaints and to find ways to prevent or at least to reduce it is occurrence.

Therefore, this review was undertaken to assess the reported postoperative complications among healthy pediatric patients (ASA I or II) following dental treatment under general anesthesia and recommendations to reduce the incidence and severity of these complications postoperatively.

Most Common Complications

Dental pain

Post-operative pain was the most frequently reported complaint following dental treatment under general anesthesia and the longest complaint reported by the patients [2,3,5,10]. The reported incidence of dental pain in the previous studies ranges from 0% to 95%.

It is not associated with the type of dental treatment provided but was significantly associated with the total number of teeth treated [5]. Atan et al. also found that the number of surgical procedures was significantly associated with postoperative pain (OR = 1•37). But, by using local anesthesia intraoperatively, the odds were reduced (OR = 0•59) [2]. A recent study reported the same factor which is the use of local anesthesia reduced the postoperative frequency of pain [5].

The number of extracted teeth had affected the postoperative pain by that, children with 7-10 extractions had significantly increased in pain score compared to those with 1-6 extracted teeth [19]. This is similar to the previous studies, the type and number of the procedure had affected the incidence and severity of postoperative pain, children with the increased number of extracted teeth were more likely to feel pain postoperatively [10-13].

On the other hand, Erkmen Almaz et al. concluded that the postoperative dental pain was not related to the type of the dental treatment nor with the number of overall treated teeth [4]. And in the Chelliah study, the majority of the patients had only mild pain or no pain at all after teeth extractions even no analgesics were required [24]. Despite the comprehensive dental treatment performed in the Vinckier et al. study, none of their children complaint of pain postoperatively. This could be attributed to the administration of intraoperative analgesia at the end of the procedure and this is similar to the Jensen study where despite the extraction of the primary and permanent teeth, the reported pain was very low [15,25].

The highest recorded pain was immediately or within 24 hours postoperatively and then was subsided gradually [4,10,26]. Zhang et al. revealed that the risk factor that increased the postoperative pain was the operation duration. This could be attributed to the complexity of the procure as the duration increased [3]. In addition, Needleman et al. found other risk factors that increased the incidence of pain in children aged 4 years or older; the dental procedure included extractions, the total number of the procedure was 12 or more, and traumatic intubation. Children who had traumatic intubation were reported to experience more pain postoperatively [10]. Also, the adult who is accompanying the child had significantly affected the pain reporting in that the complaint of pain was higher if the mother attended to his/her child [12]. In addition, those who were anesthetized with sevoflurane complained of more pain compared to those anesthetized with halothane [18]. Parent education and socioeconomic status (SES) had affected the pain reporting in that parents who are less educated or have low SES were more likely to report pain [10,27,28].

A randomized controlled trial conducted to assess postoperative pain by using local anesthesia intraoperatively, found that the pain scores were not significantly different between the treatment group and the control group and it was not effective in reducing the pain nor distress among the pediatric patients. Even though the analgesic (acetaminophen elixir) was administrated preoperatively for both groups. Also, the requirement of postoperative analgesia did not make a difference between the two groups. On the other hand, the administration of local anesthesia causes trauma to the lips and cheek due to the altered sensation. But, only three patients in the local anesthesia group reported these injuries [19].

Local anesthesia is usually used for pain management, to reduce the bleeding after tooth extraction, and to control the physiological response by reducing the anesthetic agents used. A systematic review was done to assess whether using local anesthesia intraoperatively will reduce pain postoperatively following dental treatment among pediatric patients and adolescents. The evidence was inconclusive regarding the significant benefit of using local anesthesia. Further randomized controlled trials are needed [29].

Moness ali, et al. sin a recent randomized controlled trial among different subgroups of children who underwent restorative dental treatment with and without extractions under general anesthesia found that there was no significant benefit of administrating intraoperative local anesthesia between the subgroups on postoperative pain using a universal pain assessment tool and for each patient seven pain scores were recorded.

However, postoperative bleeding was not assessed in their study [30].

The drawbacks of using local anesthesia in young children along with the numbness sensation that can increase postoperative distress did not reduce the pain postoperatively despite the use of preoperative analgesics (paracetamol and NSAIDS). However, the administration of local anesthesia manifests its role in controlling postoperative bleeding [31].

The reported pain complaints among the studies are variable due to the differences in patient’s age, provided dental treatment, use of local anesthesia intraoperatively, pain scales used, and analgesics are given at the end of the procedure. Self-report of pain is the best pain assessment method [32,33]. However, pain assessment in the pediatric patient is difficult, and there is no best assessment tool that best describes the pain the child is feeling [34]. So the reported pain was mostly by the patient’s parents or nurses not by the patient itself which can result in over or underestimation of the child’s pain.

Bleeding

In healthy pediatric patients, blood loss following dental extraction under general anesthesia can be affected by several factors, including the number of extractions, root resorption, presence of infection, socket size, and surgical procedure used for the extraction [35]. The estimated total blood loss following teeth extraction ranged from 2.5 up to 57mL [36].

Bleeding was significantly higher in patients with an increased number of extracted teeth [5,19,36-38]. However, other studies reported no association between postoperative dental bleeding and the number of extracted teeth [3,4]. And this could be related to the vasoconstrictor within the local anesthesia given intraoperatively and packing of the alveolar socket. In some cases, hospital admission is needed to control the bleeding following dental extractions [39].

Many techniques are documented to minimize the postoperative bleeding, such as absorbable hemostatic packs, suturing, local anesthesia, contained vasoconstrictor, and pressure packs in the surgical site [40]. In a pilot study, the placing of absorbable hemostatic packs had a significant advantage in minimizing the bleeding following the dental extraction procedure [35].

Another rare cause of bleeding after dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia is stainless steel crown (SSC). There were documented cases of two patients presented to the emergency department after 12 hours of the dental treatment with a chief complaint of persistent moderate gingival bleeding around tooth restored with SSC. In both cases, the bleeding could be related to traumatized soft tissues subsequent to tooth preparation and cementation of the crown. In the first case, the bleeding was also related to the residual cement in the sulcus and managed by removing the cement along with local measures including gauze pressure, placement of resorbable mesh, and application of ferric sulfate. In the second case, in addition to the bleeding that was observed persistent from the sulcus, there was lacerated palatal tissue around the crown [41].

Sore throat

The incidence of sore throat following dental treatment was very low in one study (7.9%) [3]. However, others reported that more than 20% of the pediatric patients complained of a sore throat within the first 24 hours postoperatively [4,10,11,16,42]. This complaint is most likely related to the traumatic intubation technique [10,37].

Fever

Previous studies reported the range of fever from 9% up to 45% [3,4,42-44]. There are many factors that could increase the incidence of fever following the treatment under general anesthesia, including but not limited to: dehydration, bacteremia, increase the temperature of the operating room, some medications, and soft tissue destruction [3,43]. Dehydration and low nutritional status were significant factors of the development of fever after general anesthesia [3,45].

Psychological changes

The percentage of psychological changes within 24 hours was (24.1%). However, after 72 hours the reported psychological changes were reduced significantly to (14.3%) [4]. These changes might be related to the anesthetic agent used. Sevoflurane was associated with more behavioral changes in children than those anesthetized with halothane [18,46,47]. The behavioral changes could be attributed to the procedure used to anesthetize the child who is extremely anxious in the dental clinic.

A systematic review that compares the effects of sevoflurane with other general anesthetic agents found that children who were anesthetized with sevoflurane were more agitated [48]. Agitation in healthy children was reported in some studies, it ranges from 26% to 76% following dental general anesthesia [3,10].

The feeling of irritability could be attributed to many reasons as reported by Hu et al., such as the new environment to the child, long-term fasting, and parent separation [5]. In addition, one of the significant factors related to posthospitalization anxiety is child separation from the parent during the anesthesia induction [49].

Other complications

Sleepiness, nausea, weakness, and dizziness were all reported to be associated with general anesthetic time, duration, patient gender, and use of local anesthesia [2].

The procedure duration was the factor associated with postoperative drowsiness and sleepiness as shown in the previous studies [2,3,10]. Others found a relation between some types of anesthetic agents (sevoflurane and Propofol) and the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and drowsiness [50,51]. After 72 hours of the postoperative period, these complaints were reduced significantly [4,37].

The feeling of sleepiness was most commonly reported 1 h after the procedure under general anesthesia (84%), and the documented sleepiness in the previous studies ranged from 43% up to 84% [2,3,10, 14,16].

Dizziness complaint postoperatively was 3 times higher (OR = 3•14) if the local anesthetic was given during the procedure [2]. Also, Zhang et al. found that the patients who received local anesthesia were more likely to feel drowsy postoperatively [3].

In a study conducted on 200 dental cases among pediatric patients treated under general anesthesia, vomiting was the most common complication in a patient younger than five years of age [42]. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was strongly associated with the type of surgery performed [52]. However, there is a dentally related factor that might also increase the incidence, which is the dental procedure provided to the patient. Extraction cases result in more postoperative vomiting and this is related to the swallowing of the blood after dental extractions [53]. On the other hand, the anesthetic most important factor is the use of volatile anesthetic gases [54]. Using opioids analgesics intra- or postoperatively, intake of oral food or fluids pre- or immediately postoperatively, and patients who have a high predisposition to PONV are other reported factors [10,55-59]. So, dental procedures under general anesthesia should be considered to have a high emetic risk postoperatively and the patient should receive prophylactic antiemetic drugs [60].

Other documented minor reversible complications were also reported and commonly observed include swelling in the oral or perioral area and iatrogenic trauma (such as minor abrasion, burns, or laceration of the oral soft tissues). Within 2 weeks following the completion of the procedure, these complaints most probably will resolve without intervention [49].

Intubation type

Intubation type and technique had been reported to have a role in the side effects after dental treatment under general anesthesia.

Intubation with endotracheal tubes (oral or nasotracheal) could lead to many morbidities following the general anesthesia. Including laryngeal pain, voice changes (hoarseness), nausea, and vomiting postoperatively [61]. Even the incidence of emergence delirium was higher in children intubated with endotracheal intubation (20%) than those intubated with laryngeal mask airway (8%) [62].

The nasotracheal intubation is more traumatic to the soft tissues than the orotracheal [63,64]. In a four years review study of the complications associated with nasotracheal intubationthe reported complications were common especially among young children [65]. Sore throat, coughing, and epistaxis are associated with stimulation or traumatization of the respiratory tract’s mucosa. Traumatic nasotracheal intubation was associated with more reports of pain and sore throat in a Needleman et al. study [10,66,67]. On the other hand, its advantage is easier accessibility to the oral cavity in comparison to oral intubation [64,68].

Epistaxis was reported to be low as 7.8% up to 12.8% following dental general anesthesia [3,11]. And bacteremia has been reported to be the reason for nasal bleeding [69,70]. The incidence of bacteremia was more likely to occur with the nasotracheal intubation compared to the orotracheal [14,71,72].

Laryngeal mask airway is a suggested alternative to endotracheal intubation because it has a lower risk of traumatizing the upper respiratory tract and lower incidence of overall postoperative morbidities [61,73]. A prospective randomized control trial was done to assess the differences between nasotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway in a group of pediatric patients undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia, the results showed that the laryngeal mask airway was less traumatic, results in significantly less laryngeal pain postoperatively (8.5%) compared to nasotracheal intubation group (97.2%), and after 6 hours none of the children intubated with laryngeal mask airway complained of a laryngeal pain. Moreover, a significant reduction was reported with regarding to emergence delirium and recovery time in children intubated with laryngeal mask airway [73]. In addition, the soft tissue trauma postoperatively as a consequence of the intubation in children was very low in laryngeal mask airway compared to the endotracheal intubation group (10%) [74]. In a systematic review, the documented incidence of sore throat was (21.5%) in the laryngeal mask airway and (34.3%) for the endotracheal intubated patients [75].

Recommendations to reduce the incidence of the postoperative complications: [5,8,10,26,35,40,45,49,60,73]

✓ The presence of the parent during induction of general anesthesia in the operating room might reduce the incidence of separation anxiety in the postoperative period.

✓ Laryngeal mask airway can be an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric dental procedures.

✓ Using intraoperative prophylactic antiemetic agents (such as dexamethasone or ondansetron) to reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

✓ Intraoperative use of local anesthesia might be helpful to minimize the anesthetic requirements, provide some postoperative analgesia, and most importantly help in controlling the postoperative bleeding.

✓ Teeth extraction prioritization should be considered in high emetic risk patients or ensuring of bleeding controlled before the extubation to reduce the chance of postoperative nausea and vomiting as a consequence of blood swallowing.

✓ Placing of resorbable hemostatic packs in the socket and/or sutures after extraction or any other surgical procedures can be used to minimize the bleeding.

✓ Gentle manipulation of soft tissues during tooth preparation and ensure removal of excess cement after crown cementation.

✓ Intraoperative Administration of intravenous analgesics such as the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent, ketorolac, given 30 min before the termination of the procedure can also provide significant postoperative

✓ Monitoring of the vital signs; initially it needs to be documented every 5-minutes, and then every 10-15 minutes in an alert child. analgesia.

✓ Applying gauze packs for hemostasis immediately in postoperative periods.

✓ Optimal hydration to reduce the incidence of fever.

✓ Using ice chips for sore throat and acetaminophen for fever.

✓ Pain control agents should be prescribed and given as prophylaxis in the first few days postoperatively instead of recommending as needed "PRN" analgesics (e.g. acetaminophen alone or with hydrocodone, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents).

Conclusion

Generally, the benefits of comprehensive dental treatment of healthy pediatric patients under general anesthesia outweigh its risks. The reported complications are considered to be mild to moderate in severity and it can be managed without hospitalization. Writing all the possible complaints in the informed consent and discussing them with the patient’s parent is critical. Following the recommendations outlined in this review could reduce the severity of the complaint in the postoperative period.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of Interest

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry 2020; 292-310.
  2. Atan S, Ashley P, Gilthorpe MS, et al. Morbidity following dental treatment of children under intubation general anaesthesia in a day-stay unit. Int J Paediatr Dent 2004; 14:9-16.
  3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  4. Zhang Q, Deng X, Wang Y, et al. Postoperative complications in chinese children following dental general anesthesia: A cross-sectional study. Medicine 2020; 99:e23065.
  5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  6. Erkmen Almaz M, Akbay Oba A, Saroglu Sonmez I. Postoperative morbidity in pediatric patients following dental treatment under general anesthesia. Eur Oral Res 2019; 53:113-18.
  7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  8. Hu YH, Tsai A, Ou-Yang LW, et al. Postoperative dental morbidity in children following dental treatment under general anesthesia. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18:84.
  9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  10. Krippaehne JA, Montgomery MT. Morbidity and mortality from pharmacosedation and general anesthesia in the dental office. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50:691-8.
  11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  12. Lee JY, Roberts MW. Mortality risks associated with pediatric dental care using general anesthesia in a hospital setting. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003; 27:381-383.
  13. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  14. Costa LR, Harrison R, Aleksejuniene J, et al. Factors related to postoperative discomfort in young children following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent 2011; 33:321-6.
  15. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  16. Mayeda C, Wilson S. Complications within the first 24 hours after dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent 2009; 31:513-519.
  17. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  18. Needleman HL, Harpavat S, Wu S, et al. Postoperative pain and other sequelae of dental rehabilitations performed on children under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent 2008; 30:111-21.
  19. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  20. Cantekin K, Yildirim MD, Delikan E, et al. Postoperative discomfort of dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30:784-8.
  21. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  22. Fung DE, Cooper DJ, Barnard KM, et al. Pain reported by children after dental extractions under general anaesthesia: A pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent 1993; 3:23-28.
  23. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  24. Noble DW, Raab GM, MacLean D, et al. Prilocaine infiltration as postoperative analgesia for children having dental extractions under general anesthesia. Reg Anesth 1994; 19:126-31.
  25. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  26. Hosey MT, Macpherson LM, Adair P, et al. Dental anxiety, distress at induction and postoperative morbidity in children undergoing tooth extraction using general anaesthesia. Br Dent J 2006; 200:39-43.
  27. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  28. Vinckier F, Gizani S, Declerck D. Comprehensive dental care for children with rampant caries under general anaesthesia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11:25-32.
  29. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  30. Holt RD, Chidiac RH, Rule DC. Dental treatment for children under general anaesthesia in day care facilities at a London dental hospital. Br Dent J 1991; 170:262-6.
  31. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  32. Enever GR, Nunn JH, Sheehan JK. A comparison of post-operative morbidity following outpatient dental care under general anaesthesia in paediatric patients with and without disabilities. Int J Ped Dent 2000; 10:120-5.
  33. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  34. Ersin NK, Onçag O, Cogulu D, et al. Postoperative morbidities following dental care under day-stay general anesthesia in intellectually disabled children. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63:1731-6.
  35. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  36. Coulthard P, Rolfe S, Mackie IC, et al. Intraoperative local anaesthesia for paediatric postoperative oral surgery pain--a randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35:1114-9.
  37. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  38. Haubek D, Fuglsang M, Poulsen S, et al. Dental treatment of children referred to general anaesthesia--association with country of origin and medical status. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16:239-46.
  39. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  40. O'Donnell A, Henderson M, Fearne J, et al. Management of postoperative pain in children following extractions of primary teeth under general anaesthesia: A comparison of paracetamol, Voltarol and no analgesia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17:110-115.
  41. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  42. Kain ZN. Perioperative information and parental anxiety: The next generation (Editorials). Anesth Analg 1999; 88:237-39.
  43. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  44. Apfelbaum JL, Silverstein JH, Chung FF, et al. American society of anesthesiologists task force on postanesthetic care. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: an updated report by the American society of anesthesiologists task force on postanesthetic care. Anesth 2013; 118:291-307.
  45. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  46. Chelliah S, Fell D, Brooks H. Pain and analgesia requirement after day case exodontia in children. Pediatr Anesth 2002; 12: 834.
  47. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  48. Jensen B. Post-operative pain and pain management in children after dental extractions under general anaesthesia. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2012; 13:119-125.
  49. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  50. Wong M, Copp PE, Haas DA. Postoperative pain in children after dentistry under general anesthesia. Anesth Prog 2015; 62:140-52.
  51. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  52. Grøholt EK, Stigum H, Nordhagen R, Köhler L. Recurrent pain in children, socio-economic factors and accumulation in families. Eur J Epidemiol 2003; 18:965-75.
  53. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  54. Ratnayake N, Ekanayake L. Prevalence and impact of oral pain in 8-year-old children in Sri Lanka. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005; 15:105-12.
  55. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  56. Parekh S, Gardener C, Ashley PF, et al. Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for dental treatment in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD009742.
  57. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  58. Moness Ali AM, Hammuda AA. Local anesthesia effects on postoperative pain after pediatric oral rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent 2019; 41:181-85.
  59. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  60. McWilliams PA, Rutherford JS. Assessment of early postoperative pain and haemorrhage in young children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthesia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17:352-357.
  61. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  62. Bieri D, Reeve RA, Champion DG, et al. The faces pain scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain 1990; 41:139-50.
  63. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  64. Voepel-Lewis T, Merkel S, Tait AR, et al. The reliability and validity of the Face, legs, activity, cry, consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1224-1229.
  65. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  66. Singer AJ, Gulla J, Thode HC. Parents and practitioners are poor judges of young children's pain severity. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9:609-12.
  67. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  68. Mattox SL, Hammersmith KJ, Peng J, et al. Absorbable hemostatic pack effect after primary incisor extraction: A pilot study and introduction of a novel scale to assess post-operative bleeding. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 45:67-73.
  69. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  70. Henderson NJ, Crawford PJ, Bell CN. Blood loss following extraction of deciduous teeth under general anaesthetic. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997; 42:349-352.
  71. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  72. Farsi N, Ba'akdah R, Boker A, et al. Postoperative complications of pediatric dental general anesthesia procedure provided in Jeddah hospitals, Saudi Arabia. BMC Oral Health 2009; 19:9:6.
  73. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  74. Al-Bahlani S, Sherriff A, Crawford PJ. Tooth extraction, bleeding and pain control. J R Coll Surg Edinb 2001; 46:261-4.
  75. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  76. Blacoe DA, Cunning E, Bell G. Paediatric day-case surgery: An audit of unplanned hospital admission royal hospital for sick children, Glasgow. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:610-5.
  77. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  78. Kumbargere Nagraj S, Prashanti E, Aggarwal H, et al. Interventions for treating post-extraction bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 3:CD011930.
  79. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  80. Helder C, Fleagle J, Alimorad L, Cottam M. Postoperative bleeding complications after stainless steel crown placement: A case series. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 45:12-14.
  81. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  82. Enger DJ, Mourino AP. A survey of 200 pediatric dental general anesthesia cases. ASDC J Dent Child 1985; 52:36-41.
  83. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  84. Escanilla-Casal A, Ausucua-Ibanez M, Aznar-Gomez M, et al. Comparative study of postoperative morbidity in dental treatment under general anesthesia in pediatric patients with and without an underlying disease. Int J Ped Dent 2016; 26:141-148.
  85. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  86. Morrow JW, Seale NS, Berry CW, et al. Incidence of temperature elevations after a full mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. ASDC J Dent Child 1986; 53:420-4.
  87. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  88. Fan JL, Cotter JD, Lucas RA, et al. Human cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular function during severe passive hyperthermia: Effects of mild hypohydration. J Appl Physiol 2008; 105:433-45.
  89. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  90. Breschan C, Platzer M, Jost R, et al. Midazolam does not reduce emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17:347-52.
  91. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  92. Keaney A, Diviney D, Harte S, et al. Postoperative behavioral changes following anesthesia with sevoflurane. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14:866-70.
  93. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  94. Costi D, Cyna AM, Ahmed S, et al. Effects of sevoflurane versus other general anaesthesia on emergence agitation in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; CD007084.
  95. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  96. Jones JE, Emhardt JD, Yepes JF. Hospital dental services for children and the use of general anesthesia. In: Dean JA, editor. McDonald and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. Mosby, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2021; 380-400.
  97. Google Scholar

  98. Hong JY, Oh JI, Kim SM. Comparison of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide and target-controlled propofol with fentanyl anesthesia for hysteroscopy. Yonsei Med J 2002; 43:420-6.
  99. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  100. Jokela RM, Kangas-Saarela TA, Valanne JV, et al. Postoperative nausea and vomiting after sevoflurane with or without ondansetron compared with propofol in female patients undergoing breast surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:1062-5.
  101. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  102. Kovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs 2000; 59:213-43.
  103. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  104. Kovac AL. Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children. Paediatr Drugs 2007; 9:47-69.
  105. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  106. Apfel CC, Kranke P, Katz MH, et al. Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not delayed postoperative vomiting: A randomized controlled trial of factorial design. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:659-68.
  107. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  108. Bourdaud N, Devys JM, Bientz J, et al. Development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients: the VPOP score. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24:945-952.
  109. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  110. Eberhart LHJ, Geldner G, Kranke P, et al. The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2004; 99:1630-37.
  111. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  112. de Boer HD, Detriche O, Forget P. Opioid-related side effects: Postoperative ileus, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, and shivering. A review of the literature. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2017; 31:499-504.
  113. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  114. Karlsson E, Larsson LE, Nilsson K. Postanesthetic nausea in children. Acta Anaesth Scand 1990; 34:515-8.
  115. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  116. Tan SGM, May HA, Cunlife MA. An audit of pain and vomiting in paediatric day case surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 1994; 4:105-9.
  117. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  118. El Batawi HY, Shorrab AA. Intra operative use of anti emetic drugs for children undergoing full dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. A double blind randomized clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016; 40:235-40.
  119. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  120. Zhao N, Deng F, Yu C. Anaesthesia for pediatric day-case dental surgery: A study comparing the classic laryngeal mask airway with nasal trachea intubation. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25:245-48.
  121. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  122. Tian Y, Wu XY, Li L, et al. A clinical trial evaluating the laryngeal mask airway Supreme in obese children during general anaesthesia. Arch Med Sci 2017; 13:183.
  123. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  124. Hall CEJ, Shutt LE. Nasotracheal intubation for head and neck surgery. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:249-56.
  125. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  126. Prasanna D, Bhat S. Nasotracheal intubation: An overview. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 13:366-72.
  127. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  128. Black AE, Hatch DJ, Nauth-Misir N. Complications of nasotracheal intubation in neonates, infants and children: A review of 4 years' experience in a children's hospital. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65:461-467.
  129. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  130. El-Boghdadly K, Bailey CR, Wiles MD. Postoperative sore throat: A systematic review. Anaesthesia 2016; 71:706-17.
  131. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  132. Chang JE, Kim H, Han SH, et al. Effect of endotracheal tube cuff shape on postoperative sore throat after endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1240-45.
  133. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  134. Wong A, Subar P, Witherell H, et al. Reducing nasopharyngeal trauma: The urethral catheter-assisted nasotracheal intubation technique. Anesth Prog 2011; 58:26-30.
  135. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  136. Onçag O, Cökmez B, Aydemir S, et al. Investigation of bacteremia following nasotracheal intubation. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15:194-198.
  137. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  138. Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Kent ML, et al. Impact of amoxicillin prophylaxis on the incidence, nature, and duration of bacteremia in children after intubation and dental procedures. Circulation 2004; 109:2878-84.
  139. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  140. Berry FA, Blankenbaker WL, Ball CG. Comparison of bacteremia occurring with nasotracheal and orotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1973; 52:873-876.
  141. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  142. Roberts GJ, Holzel HS, Sury MR, et al. Dental bacteremia in children. Pediatr Cardiol 1997; 18:24-27.
  143. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  144. Keles S, Kocaturk O. Postoperative discomfort and emergence delirium in children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia: comparison of nasal tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway. J Pain Res 2018; 11:103-110.
  145. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

  146. Jamil SN, Alam M, Usmani H, et al. A study of the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMAW) in children and its comparison with endotracheal intubation. Indian J Anaesth 2009; 53:174-178.
  147. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  148. Seung HY, Beirne OR. Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation: A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:2359-76.
  149. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref,

Author Info

Shahad S Alkhuwaiter*

Department of Orthodontic and Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
 

Received: 04-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-57801; , Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-57801 (PQ); Editor assigned: 07-Mar-2022, Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-57801 (PQ); Reviewed: 21-Mar-2022, QC No. JRMDS-22-57801; Revised: 25-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-577801 (R); Published: 31-Mar-2022

http://sacs17.amberton.edu/