Research - (2020) Advances in Dental Surgery
Remineralizing Efficacy of Biomimetic Self-Assembling Peptide on Artificially Induced Enamel Lesions (In vitro Study)
Yahya Muhammad Yahya* and Nadia Aftan Al Rawi
*Correspondence: Yahya Muhammad Yahya, Department of Pedodontic and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq, Email:
Background: The technology of self-assembling peptides have been progressed as an alternative remineralizing agent to fluoride, that assemble into a fibrillar three-dimensional scaffold. Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of self-assembling peptide (P11-4) on enamel remineralization both alone and in combination with flouride compared to fluoride-based delivery systems and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF). Materials and Methods: Enamel caries-like lesions were created artificially on the buccal surfaces of 25 extracted human maxillary first premolars of permanent teeth. Specimens were randomly arranged into five groups (n = 5) based on the remineralizing agent used: Group 1–control: Artificial saliva, Group 2 – fluoride varnish, Group 3 – CPP-ACPF varnish, Group 4–self-assembling peptide agent, Group 5 - double application group (self-assembling peptide and fluoride). The application of all the materials was according to their producer's instructions and the storage of the specimens were in artificial saliva that renewed daily. Assessment of surface microhardness (SMH) was done at baseline, after demineralization and after 2weeks of remineralizing agents’ application, then the data were analyzed using ANOVA and paired t-test. Results: Although, no significant difference in decrement in enamel microhardness between flouride, self-assemblig peptide and the double application group, while it was significantly higher in these groups when compared to CPP-ACPF. In addition, the control group revealed, no statistically significant difference in mean of enamel microhardness after remineralization compared to that after demineralization. Conclusions: Self-assembling peptide alone and its combination with fluoride varnish, both have the same remineralizing efficacy, showing an encouraging, noninvasive regeneration potential as an alternative remineralizing agent to fluoride.
Self-assembling peptide, Guided enamel regeneration, Surface microhardness
Dental caries is a multifactorial disease, depending on the balance occurring between both protective and pathological factors. The understanding of the need to initiate a healthy balance in the oral environment between these factors gradually shift the treatment principles for dental caries management toward the prevention of disease progression and enhancement of Remineralization process .
The Remineralization process of dental tissues is defined as deposition of calcium and phosphate ions that are delivered from an external source into crystal voids in demineralized enamel that result in a net mineral gain. The cornerstone of the Remineralization process is the fluoride, while its ability in promoting net Remineralization is limited to the availability of both phosphate and calcium ions .
There are many materials that are available nowadays for dental Remineralization. Although the fluoride remains the utmost well-known and the most widely used one, many limitations of its usage have been developed. One of these is that the fluoride (specifically in high concentrations) shows a dominated surface Remineralization when compared to the body of the carious lesion, causing difficulty to achieve full body Remineralization .
The efficacy of topical fluoride applications, which act as a cariostatic agents, have been confirmed, and fluoride is considered the most effective method for arresting and preventing the formation of dental caries. Despite of many professional topical fluoride applications have long been used; the most effective kinds of fluoride (F) that inducing remineralization of initial carious lesions still unclear .
The CPP-ACP binds easily both to the tooth surface and the bacteria in dental plaque. The major function of CPP-ACPF (CPP-ACP fluoride) is to stabilize a high concentration of calcium and phosphate ions at tooth surface by binding at pellicle and plaque. It come up with a very effective mode that elevating the amount of calcium present in the fluid of dental plaque, forming a desirable condition for increasing the remineralization . The CPP-ACPF and due to the added fluoride content has shown an improvement in the ability to remineralize initial carious lesions .
Recently, self-assembling peptides (P11-4; CurodontRepair, Credentis AG, Switzerland) have been evolved to be alternative remineralizing agent to Fluoride . Self-assembling peptides come together into a fibrillary three-dimensional scaffold in the lesion according to the environmental pH and salts concentrations. So that this scaffold can then act as a nucleator for hydroxyapatite, encouraging tissue regeneration from within as shown in Figure 1. Some Studies demonstrated the helpfulness of self-assembling peptides in the natural repair process of enamel tissue, which significantly increase the mineral gain and inhibit the loss of these minerals . Based on these findings, self-assembling peptides may be helpful in mineral behavior modulation during the process of dental tissue engineering.
As an effort to illuminate the potential of remineralization for the biomimetic selfassembling peptide technology, this study was done to evaluate the efficacy of remineralization for self-assembling peptide alone and in combination with fluoride compared to fluoride alone and CPP-ACP fluoride (CPP-ACPF), assessed by surface microhardness (SMH) measurements. The null hypotheses suggested that there is no difference in the potential of remineralizing efficacy between self-assembling peptide, self-assembling peptides in combination with fluoride varnish, CPP-ACPF, fluoride alone and artificial saliva using microhardness testing.
Materials and Methods
The materials that have been tested for the remineralization in this study were as following: (1) ALPHA PRO®(Dental Technologies, INC , USA) as fluoride varnish with the fluoride concentration of 22,600 ppm. (2) MI varnish (GC company, Japan) as CPP-ACPF varnish which consisted of 5% CPP-ACP and 22,600 ppm fluoride. (3) CURODONT Repair (Credentis, Switzerland), that designed Curolox® technology which is based on the self-assembling peptide (P11-4).
Tooth surface preparation
A total of 25 sound extracted maxillary permanent first premolars teeth were used. All Teeth have been cleaned by ultrasonic scaler, prophylaxis done with rubber cup and pumice then stored for 2 weeks in a thymol solution . Teeth inspection was done to exclude any enamel defects, stains, caries or cracks. Then a mold of self-cured acrylic resin was used for each tooth by embedding the tooth in the mold with its buccal surface directed upward. Then buccal surfaces were polished by Sof-Lex Disks (3M ESPE, USA) in a progressive manner (beginning with the coarse, then medium and fine, ending with the superfine) using contra-angle slowspeed hand-piece . A window of exposed enamel 2 mm × 2 (in dimension) was created by coating the remaining buccal surface of each tooth with anail varnish (Pank, paris) which is an acid-resistant one.
The demineralizing solution was prepared by using the following concentrations: 2.2 mM sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate dehydrate (NaH2PO4), 2.2 mM calcium chloride (CaCl2) and acetic acid with the concentration of 0.05 M; then adjusting the pH were done to 4.4 by adding 1M potassium hydroxide. Followed by immersion of Each specimen individually in the demineralizing solution for 4 successive days (96 h) to form artificial caries-like lesions on enamel surface . Then washed carefully and kept in storage with deionized water.
Sample grouping and Remineralization process
The preparation of artificial saliva was done according to ten Cate and Duijsters' formulation . And consisted of 0.9 mM NaH2PO4, 1.5 mM CaCl2 and 0.15 M potassium chloride, the pH was adjusted to 7.0. According to the treatments applied, all the Specimens were haphazardly divided into five groups (n=5):
Group 1 (the control group): The specimens were stored in daily renewed artificial saliva without any treatment.
Group 2 (the fluoride group): Each specimen in this group was dried and coated with a uniform, thin layer of the fluoride varnish, then left it for 20 s to allow the varnish to be absorbed, followed by air-dryness.
Group 3 (the CPP-ACPF group): Each specimen in this group was dried and coated with a uniform, thin layer of the MI varnish. Then the varnish was left without any interruption for 20 s.
Group 4 (self-assembling peptide group): The agent was supplied by the manufacure in plastic containers with their own brushes , the application of the material was done on the tooth surface and left intact for 5 min (until all the material disappear), so allowing it to be diffused and self-assembly.
Group 5 double application group (selfassembling peptide and fluoride): application of self-assembling peptide and left for 5 min, allowing it to diffuse (according to manufacture instructions), and then application of fluoride varnish was done, then left it for 20 s to allow the varnish to be absorbed.
After the first 6 h of storage in artificial saliva for specimens in (group 2, 3 and 5), the varnish was removed with cotton and distilled water.
The storage of all Specimens was done by putting each group separately in artificial saliva that renewed daily until SMH test. 
Assessment of surface microhardness
Twenty-five teeth were used to measure SMH at baseline (sound enamel surface), after demineralization process and then after 2weeks of remineralization. The measurements were accomplished with digital Vickers microhardness tester with a diamond indenter, in the laboratory of metal testing, Department of Metallurgy and Production Engineering, University of Technology. Collecting the measurements was carried out through the application of 500 g load for 30 s directed vertically to the enamel surface. All the measurements were completed by using the same calibrated machine and same examiner. The average of three indentations in each reading was taken, and that represent the hardness value for each specimen.
Data analysis was done by using the 25th version of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The data presented as mean, standard deviation and ranges. While Categorical data presented by percentages and frequencies. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (two tailed) was used to compare the mean of enamel microhardness between groups. Paired t-test was used to compare the mean of enamel microhardness at baseline level, after the demineralization process, and after remineralization. A level of P– value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Table 1 shows the comparison between study groups by baseline enamel microhardness of teeth. There was no statistically significant difference (P= 0.317) in baseline enamel microhardness of teeth between study groups.
The comparison between enamel microhardness at baseline and after demineralization showed that means of enamel microhardness at baseline was significantly higher than that after demineralization (364.62 and 218.76, P= 0.001) as presented in Table 2.
Table 3 shows the comparison in enamel microhardness after remineralization with that after demineralization in each study group. In this study, means of enamel microhardness in groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 were significantly increased (P < 0.05) after remineralization compared to that after demineralization.
In group 1, no statistically significant difference (P= 0.232) in mean of enamel microhardness after remineralization compared to that after demineralization.
Table 4 shows the comparison between study groups in percentage of change in enamel microhardness after remineralization compared to demineralization. It was obvious that this percentage of change in enamel microhardness was significantly higher in group 2 than that in other groups (75.38%, P= 0.001).
Post hoc tests (LSD) were run to confirm the differences occurred between groups and showed that mean of percentage of change in enamel microhardness was significantly higher in group 2 than that groups (1 and 3); while no significant difference in decrement in enamel microhardness between groups 2 and (4 and 5) as shown in Table 5.
Several New approaches have been developed for the treatment of initial carious lesions, that would address the gap in the treatment among preventive and restorative measures [13,14]. One of these approaches that have been proposed as a possible solution is Guided Enamel Regeneration (GER) which is based on forming a scaffold that mimic the enamel matrix . The technology of self-assembling peptide combined with GER is based on forming a 3D scaffold through the assembling of short hydrophilic peptide into fibers .
Different approaches are used to provide proof for mineral gain or loss. The most widely used one is SMH analyses, which assess the demineralization and remineralization changes that have been occurred in enamel. The evaluations of SMH are fast, simple, and easy to measure in a nondestructive pattern. The SMH mechanism of action is depending on quantifying the resistance of the materials’ surfaces contrary to plastic deformation from a standard source, so the measurements can be taken from the same specimen repeatedly over a period of time, decreasing the experimental disparity, all these make the evaluation of SMH is a practical choice for mineral changes’ estimations .
The results revealed that means of enamel microhardness at baseline was significantly higher than that after demineralization.
Data analysis showed that all four treatment procedures significantly enhanced the remineralization of enamel lesions and a significant increase of enamel microhardness have been gained when compared to artificial saliva.
group treated with fluoride showed highest enamel microhardness than other groups followed by the double application group then self-assembling peptide and CPP-ACPF, however the lowermost mean of SMH has been found in artificial saliva.
The comparison between study groups in percentage of change in enamel microhardness after remineralization compared to demineralization. Although It was obvious that this percentage of change in enamel microhardness was higher in fluoride group than that in other groups. But there was no significant difference in decrement in enamel microhardness between groups of fluoride, self-assembling peptide and double application group, that disagree with Kamal D. et al. who found that Self-assembling peptides showed the uppermost remineralizing efficacy when compared to fluoride . These findings could be attributed to fluoride's capability in forming fluorapatite crystals by attracting phosphate and calcium ions that will lead to increase in mineral content .
The findings of the group treated with CPPACPF, which is a calcium phosphate-based agent exhibited a significant increase in the mean of SMH in comparison to group of artificial saliva. this may be explained by the formulation of CPPACP agent which consist of two parts: CPP and ACP. CPP is a phosphoprotein that is milk-derived and has a notable ability in the stabilization of high ACP concentrations which is asoluble compound, and will prevent them from growing to the serious size that are required for their nucleation and precipitation. CPP-ACP forming nanocomplexes that bind onto dental plaque and enamel surfaces, acting as a reservoir for high level of phosphate and calcium ions that present in a nonstructurally bound patterns favoring the remineralization to be achieved .
A statistically significant difference in the mean of SMH have been found between fluoride and CPP-ACPF. These results disagree with studies done by Shetty et al., and Mohd Said et al. [21.,22]. And agree with Lata et al.,  who stated that CPP-ACPF is not as efficient as fluoride in the remineralization of enamel carious lesions. These results may be related to fluoride that shows higher remineralizing potential than CPPACPF.
Values of remineralization for the control group revealed the least measurements, and this is coordinate with studies done by Somani et al. . Who found that the control group disclosed the least remineralization values? This could be due to the formulation of the artificial saliva that have been used in this study, which did not have any fluoride ions .
Self-assembling peptide and the combination of it with fluoride varnish both have the same remineralizing efficacy. Showing an encouraging and noninvasive regeneration potential to be an alternative remineralizing agent to fluoride.
- Featherstone JD. Dental caries: A dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J 2008; 53:286-291.
- Vogel GL, Schumacher GE, Chow LC, et al. Ca pre-rinse greatly increases plaque and plaque fluid F. J Dent Res 2008; 87:466–469.
- Goswami M, Saha S, Chaitra TR. Latest developments in non-fluoridated remineralizing technologies. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012; 30:2–6.
- ten Cate JM. Remineralization of deep enamel dentine caries lesions. Aust Dent J 2008; 53:281-285.
- Hegde MN, Moany A. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions with casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate: A quantitative energy dispersive X-ray analysis using scanning electron microscopy: An in vitro study. J Conservative Dent 2012; 15:61.
- Deng M, Wen H, Dong X, et al. Effects of 45S5 bioglass on surface properties of dental enamel subjected to 35% hydrogen peroxide. Int J Oral Sci 2013; 5:103.
- Kirkham J, Firth A, Vernals D. Self-assembling peptide scaffolds promote enamel remineralization. J Dent Res 2007; 86:426-430.
- Jablonski-Momeni A, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M. Efficacy of the self-assembling peptide P11-4 in constructing a remineralization scaffold on artificially-induced enamel lesions on smooth surfaces. J Orofac Orthop 2014; 75:175-190.
- Elkassas D, Arafa A. Remineralizing efficacy of different calcium-phosphate and fluoride-based delivery vehicles on artificial caries like enamel lesions. J Dent. 2014 ;42:466–474.
- Asl-Aminabadi N, Najafpour E, Samiei M, et al. Laser-casein phosphopeptide effect on remineralization of early enamel lesions in primary teeth. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015; 7:e261–267.
- Itthagarun A, Verma S, Lalloo R, et al. Effects of fluoridated milk on artificial enamel carious lesions: A pH cycling study. J Dent 2011; 39:817–824.
- ten Cate JM, Duijsters PP. Alternating demineralization and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res 1982; 16:201–210.
- Featherstone JD. Remineralization, the natural caries repair process–the need for new approaches. Adv Dent Res 2009; 21:4–7.
- Fisher J, Johnston S, Hewson N, et al. FDI global caries initiative; implementing a paradigm shift in dental practice and the global policy context. Int Dent J 2012; 62:169–174.
- Alkilzy M, Tarabaih A, Santamaria RM, et al. Self-assembling peptide P11-4 and fluoride for regenerating enamel. J Dent Res 2018; 97:148–154.
- Davies RPW, Aggeli A, Beevers AJ, et al. Self-assembling β-sheet tape forming peptides. Supramol Chem 2006; 18:435–443.
- Oliveira GM, Ritter AV, Heymann HO, et al. Remineralization effect of CPP-ACP and fluoride for white spot lesions in vitro. J Dent 2014; 42:1592–602.
- Kamal D, Hassanein H, Elkassas D, et al. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing efficacy of biomimetic self-assembling peptide on artificially induced enamel lesions: An in vitro study. J Conservative Dent 2018; 21:536.
- Amaechi BT. Remineralization therapies for initial caries lesions. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015; 2:95–101.
- Reema SD, Lahiri PK, Roy SS. Review of casein phosphopeptides-amorphous calcium phosphate. Chin J Dent Res 2014; 17:7–14.
- Shetty S, Hegde MN, Bopanna TP. Enamel remineralization assessment after treatment with three different remineralizing agents using surface microhardness: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17:49–52.
- Mohd Said SN, Ekambaram M, Yiu CK. Effect of different fluoride varnishes on remineralization of artificial enamel carious lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; 27:163–173.
- Lata S, Varghese NO, Varughese JM. Remineralization potential of fluoride and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phospho peptide on enamel lesions: An in vitro comparative evaluation. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13:42–46.
- Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, et al. Remineralizing potential of various agents on dental erosion. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2014; 4:104–108.
- Memarpour M, Fakhraei E, Dadaein S, et al. Efficacy of fluoride varnish and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate for remineralization of primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial. Med Princ Pract 2015; 24:231–237.
Yahya Muhammad Yahya* and Nadia Aftan Al RawiDepartment of Pedodontic and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq
Citation: Yahya Muhammad Yahya, Nadia Aftan Al Rawi, Remineralizing Efficacy of Biomimetic Self-Assembling Peptide on Artificially Induced Enamel Lesions (In Vitro Study), J Res Med Dent Sci, 2020, 8 (7): 407-412.
Received: 21-Oct-2020 Accepted: 10-Nov-2020 Published: 17-Nov-2020