Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research - (2020) Volume 8, Issue 1

Translucency of Recently Introduced Extra High Translucency Zirconia

Mohammad S Alkatheeri1, AbdulAziz Altahtam2, Abdullah Abukhalaf2, Turki Almaslokhi2, Abdulrahman Almusalam2 and Thamer S Almohareb1*

*Correspondence: Thamer S Almohareb, Department of Restorative Dental Science, Dental College, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Aim: To compare the translucency of three recently introduced esthetic zirconia, Argen Z Anterior (Argen Corporation), Ceramill Zolid FX (Amann Girrbach AG), and Prettau Anterior (Zirkonzahn), with that of a commonly used esthetic ceramic material (lithium disilicate), IPS e.max CAD LT (Ivoclar Vivadent).

Materials and methods: The three partially sintered zirconia materials were sectioned using a low-speed water-cooled diamond saw into a square shape, and the final dimensions of [10.0 × 10.0 × 1.5 mm] (n=10/group) were acquired after sintering. As a reference group, the partially sintered lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD LT) blocks were sectioned and sintered into similar shapes and dimensions. Then, all samples were finished and polished. The CIE L*a*b* values for each sample were measured on a black and a white background using a spectrophotometer (LabScan XE, Hunter Lab). Then, the values of the translucency parameter (TP) were calculated. Furthermore, all samples were reduced to 1.0 mm in thickness, and the TP was obtained for a second reading. Finally, the data were statistically analyzed.

Results: The control group [IPS e.max CAD LT] was significantly more translucent than the other tested groups (P<0.05). The (Ceramill Zolid FX) zirconia material was significantly less translucent than the other two zirconia materials (ArgenZ Anterior and Prettau Anterior Zirkonzahn). There was no significant difference between the TP value of ArgenZ Anterior at the thickness of 1.0 mm and that of the control group at the thickness of 1.5 mm. Conclusion: By decreasing the thickness of the specimens, the TP will be increased. The (ArgenZ Anterior) and (Zirkonzahn) groups were more translucent than the (Ceramill Zolid FX) group. There was no significant difference between the translucency of (ArgenZ Anterior) reduced to 1.0 mm and that of the IPS e.max group at a 1.5 mm thickness (P< 0.05).

Keywords

Translucency, Spectrophotometer, Monolithic, Translucent zirconia, Zirconia, Lithium disilicate

Introduction

With the increased demand for esthetic materials in dentistry, all ceramic restorations have gained more popularity, and their chemical, physical and mechanical properties have been investigated and extensively evaluated [1-7]. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing CAD/ CAM ceramic restorations have shown in time as a reliable and time-saving treatment method [8-10]. The ceramic block materials available promote the production of different type of dental prosthesis and restorations. However, none of these ceramic materials possess ideal properties for all types of applications [11].

Zirconia (ZrO2), in particular, tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (TZPs), is a ceramic material that has high crystallinity and is characterized by excellent mechanical properties compared to those of other ceramic materials, such as feldspathic porcelain or glass ceramics [12]. Furthermore, with continuing advancement in CAD/CAM technology, machining highstrength zirconia (TZPs) to make ceramic restorations became more feasible, increasing zirconia’s popularity and versatility in clinical applications such as fixed partial dentures, fullcoverage crowns, and implant abutments [13-17]. However, the esthetic properties of zirconia (TZPs), specifically its translucency, remain a major problem [18]. Therefore, layering zirconia (TZPs) with a more esthetic ceramic material as a veneering is often performed Nonetheless, chipping and fracturing of this veneering ceramic material have been reported as a drawback [4,19-21]. To overcome the chipping problem of layered ceramic, tooth-colored fully contoured monolithic zirconia has been made commercially available [22]. However, because of its lack of translucency, the tooth-colored fully contoured monolithic zirconia is limited in clinical application in esthetically demanding areas [23]. To solve this problem, extensive research and development have focused on the production of translucent zirconia [23-28]. Translucency is one of the main characteristics of natural teeth and is considered an important esthetic factor for any material used for dental restoration [6,7]. The translucency parameter (TP) is a measurement that is usually utilized to assess the translucency of dental materials, which is the difference between the color of a material placed over a white backing and that over a black backing as measured by a colorimeter [29]. Recently, new compositions of zirconia, referred to as “extraor super-high translucency zirconia”, have been introduced to the market with a claim of very high translucency and have been promoted for clinical use in anterior teeth. However, since no studies have investigated the material translucency of extra-/super-high-translucency zirconia, the objective of this research is to assess the translucent properties of three recently introduced esthetic zirconia, ArgenZ Anterior (Argen Corporation), Ceramill Zolid FX (Amann Girrbach AG), and Prettau Anterior (Zirkonzahn), and compare them with those of a commonly used esthetic ceramic material, lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD LT, Ivoclar Vivadent).

Materials and Methods

The CAD/CAM presintered disks of zirconia (ArgenZ Anterior 98 × 14, Ceramill Zolid FX Amann Girrbach AG 98 × 87.5 × 14, Prettau Anterior Zirkonzahn 98 × 14 and IPS CAD LT BL1/C 14 compositions) were selected for the study, and their compositions were characterized (Table 1). These zirconia disks were cut using a slow-speed water-cooled diamond saw (IsoMet Low Speed Saw, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA). Taking into account the shrinkage that will occur during sintering, the cutting dimensions of all specimens were determined. All the specimens were sintered in a furnace (VITA Zyrcomat 6000 MS, VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Ceramil Zolid fx white Prettau Anterior
Component Percent by weight Component Percent by weight
ZrO2+ HfO2+Y2O3 ≥ 99.0 ZrO2 Main component
Y2O3 9.1-9.55 Y2O3 <12%
HfO2 ≤ 5.0 Al2O3 <1%
Al2O3 ≤ 0.5 SiO2 max 0.02%
Other oxidees ≤ 1.0 Fe2O3 max 0.02%
ArgenZ Anterior IPS e.max CAD LT
Component Percent by weight Component Percent by weight
ZrO2+HfO2+Y2O3 >99 % SiO2 57-80%
Y2O3 8.5-10% Li2O 11-19%
HfO2 <5% K2O 0-13%
Al2O3 <0.1% P2O5 0-11%
Fe2O3 <0.1% ZrO2 0-8%
- - ZnO 0-8%
- - Al2O3 0-5%
- - MgO 0-5%
- - Coloring oxides 0-8

Table 1: Materials composition according to the manufacturer.

To evaluate translucency, square specimens (n=10 per group) were prepared by cutting the tested materials in partially sintered form by a low-speed water-cooled diamond saw (IsoMet Low Speed Saw, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) into final dimensions of 10 ± 0.5 mm long, 10 ± 0.5 mm wide, and 1.5 ± 0.1 mm thick. The shrinkage that occurred during the sintering process was considered and accounted for in the cutting dimensions of the specimens. All the specimens were sintered in a furnace (VITA Zyrcomat 6000 MS, VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

To grind and polish both sides of the specimens, 600 and 1200 grit paper was used in a polishing machine. Before each measurement, the specimens were cleaned with distilled water in an ultrasonic machine (Dri-Clave Ultrasonic cleaner, Columbus Dental) for ten minutes and dried with compressed air. The CIE L*a*b* values were measured on a black and a white background with a colorimeter calibrated with a calibration plate positioned at a constant distance from the surface of the specimen using LabScan XE (Hunter Lab). The illumination of the light source corresponded to average daylight (D65). The material translucency was assessed by the TP value, which was measured by calculating the difference in color between the specimens placed against a white background and those placed against a black background with the following equation:

image

Where L* is brightness, a* is redness to greenness, and b* is yellowness to blueness.

B is the color value of the material measured on the black background, and W refers to the color value of the material measured on the white background. For a second reading, the same samples were reduced to 1.0 mm in thickness, and the TP was obtained again. High translucency and low opacity are indicated as a result of high TP values. For each specimen, the average value of three readings made with its respective background was taken at 1.5 mm and 1.0 mm thicknesses. The TP values for the measured ceramic materials were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) repeated measurements, followed by paired t-test and independent t-test by using SPSS 12.0 (SAS, Chicago) statistical software with a 5% significance level.

Results

The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the TP [ΔE] for all tested materials measured at 2 different thicknesses are presented in Table 2. The TP of the three zirconia specimens was significantly lower than that of the control group (IPS e.max CAD LT).

Material N Mean Std. Deviation P-value 95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Upper Bound
IPS e.max CAD LT 1.5 mm 10 10.225 1.523 0 9.135 11.315
1.0 mm 10 17.221 0.98 16.52 17.922
ArgenZ Anterior 1.5 mm 10 5.225 0.281 0 5.024 5.426
1.0 mm 10 9.481 2.063 8.005 10.957
Ceramil zolid fx 1.5 mm 10 1.984 0.479 0.001 1.641 2.327
1.0 mm 10 3.217 0.674 2.735 3.699
Prettau Anterior 1.5 mm 10 5.65 1.057 0 4.894 6.406
1.0 mm 10 7.882 1.382 6.894 8.87

Table 2: Mean ± SD of translucency parameter [ΔE] within all materials tested.

The translucency of the IPS e.max CAD LT group was significantly higher than that of the other tested materials. The difference in the TP was found to be statistically significant between the same materials at 2 different thicknesses. All samples were more translucent at 1.0 mm thickness than at 1.5 mm thickness. Table 3 shows the difference in translucency between the groups within the selected thickness. Zirconia translucency is ordered from the most translucent (highest mean TP value) to the least translucent (lowest mean TP value) [IPS e.max CAD LT, ArgenZ Anterior, Prettau Anterior (Zirkonzahn), Ceramill Zolid FX]. A multiplecomparison test between the materials at a 1.5 mm thickness and those at a 1.0 mm thickness is presented in Table 4. There was no significant difference between the TP of ArgenZ Anterior at the thickness of 1.0 mm and that of the control group at the thickness of 1.5 mm.

Material N Mean S.D ANOVA P-Value Interval for mean Multiple compression test
Lower Bound Upper Bound IPS e-max ArgenZ Ceramil Zrikonzahn
1.5 mm IPS e-max 10 10.225 1.523 0 9.135 11.315 1 - - -
ArgenZ 10 5.225 0.281 5.024 5.426 0 1 - -
Ceramil 10 1.984 0.479 1.641 2.327 0 0 1 -
Zirkonzahn 10 5.65 1.057 4.894 6.406 0 0.761 0 1
1.0 mm IPS e-max 10 17.221 0.98 0 16.52 17.922 1 - - -
ArgenZ 10 9.481 2.063 8.005 10.957 0 1 - -
Ceramil 10 3.217 0.674 2.735 3.699 0 0 - -
Zirkonzahn 10 7.882 1.382 6.5 9.264 0 0.062 0 1

Table 3: Comparison between each group within thickness of sample.

Material N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Interval of mean Multiple compression test
Lower Bound Upper Bound IPS e-max ArgenZ Ceramil Zirkonzahn IPS e-max ArgenZ Ceramil Zirkonzahn
1.5 mm 1.5 mm 1.5 mm 1.5 mm 1.00 mm 1.00 mm 1.00 mm 1.00 mm
1.5 mm IPS e-max 10 10.225 1.523 0 9.135 11.315 1   - - - - - -
ArgenZ 10 5.225 0.281 5.024 5.426 0 1 - - - - - -
Ceramil 10 1.984 0.479 1.641 2.327 0 0 1 - - - - -
Zirkonzahn 10 5.65 1.057 4.894 6.406 0 0.993 0 1 - - - -
1.00 mm IPS e-max 10 17.221 0.98 16.52 17.922 0 0 0 0 1 - - -
ArgenZ 10 9.481 2.063 8.005 10.957 0.855 0 0 0 0 1 - -
Ceramil 10 3.217 0.674 2.735 3.699 0 0.008 0.299 0 0 0 1  
zirkonzahn 10 7.882 1.382 6.5 9.264 0.001 0 0 0.002 0 0.068 0 1

Table 4: Multiple comparison test between the materials at two different thicknesses.

Discussion

The translucency of zirconia has been reported to be mainly related to grain size [30,31] and density [31]. In a study performed in 2002, [25] tested different materials and found a significant difference in translucency, which they believed was attributable to differences in the crystal volume and refractive index. Although monolithic zirconia has limited use in esthetic applications due to low translucency and high opacity, cubicphase- containing zirconia showed predictably high translucency and has promising potential for use in esthetic areas.

Tetragonal zirconia has a relatively high refractive index. The addition of alumina, with a different refractive index than zirconia, causes light passing through the alumina-doped zirconia to be sufficiently scattered or absorbed at the grain boundaries so that the zirconia appears relatively opaque. In an initial attempt to produce a more translucent version of zirconia, developers reduced the alumina content from 0.25% to less than 0.05% and improved the processing techniques to control zirconia grain size and processing density to minimize light refraction and increase translucency [32]. In the present study, ArgenZ Anterior and Prettau Anterior (Zirkonzahn) showed significantly higher translucency than Ceramill Zolid FX. This increase in translucency can be related to their composition, which contains cubic phase zirconia. The most recent strategy to increase the translucency of zirconia is to stabilize it with a significant amount of cubic crystalline phase interspersed with the tetragonal phase. Increasing the yttria content to more than 8 mol% will stabilize the cubic phase [32]. The cubic phase of zirconia is isotropic in different crystallographic directions, which decreases the light scattering that occurs at the grain boundaries. As a result, cubic zirconia appears more translucent [32]. Furthermore, thickness is a key factor of light transmittance through zirconia [33,34]. In the present study, there was an inverse relationship between thickness and translucency; translucency increased by decreasing the thickness of the specimens. Additionally, the commonly used esthetic ceramic lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) showed no significant difference in translucency at a 1.5 mm thickness compared to that of the cubicphase- containing zirconia (ArgenZ Anterior) at a 1 mm thickness, considering that the monolithic zirconia crown thickness can be reduced to 1 mm or 0.5 mm, maintaining sufficient strength and fracture resistance [35]. However, further testing of mechanical properties is needed for these specific zirconia materials.

Conclusion

Considering the limitations of the present study, the following conclusions were drawn based on the results:

→ IPS e.max is the most translucent among the materials tested in the present study, followed by ArgenZ Anterior [Argen Corporation].

→ There was an inverse relationship between thickness and translucency; i.e., by decreasing the thickness of the specimens, the TP will be increased.

→ Among the materials marketed as extra high-translucency zirconia, (ArgenZ Anterior) and (Prettau Anterior, Zirkonzahn) were more translucent than (Ceramill Zolid FX).

→ Additionally, the translucency of (ArgenZ Anterior) with a thickness of 1.0 mm is not different from that of the commonly used esthetic ceramic material, lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD), with a thickness of 1.5 mm.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the internship program at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University. In addition, we would like to thank the College of Dentistry Research Center and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for their support.

Disclosure of Interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

Author Info

Mohammad S Alkatheeri1, AbdulAziz Altahtam2, Abdullah Abukhalaf2, Turki Almaslokhi2, Abdulrahman Almusalam2 and Thamer S Almohareb1*

1Department of Restorative Dental Science, Dental College, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2Internship Program, Dental College, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
 

Citation: Mohammad Alkatheeri, AbdulAziz Altahtam, Abdullah Abukhalaf, Turki Almaslokhi, Abdulrahman Almusalam, Thamer Almohareb, Translucency of Recently Introduced Extra High Translucency Zirconia, J Res Med Dent Sci, 2020, 8(1):175-180.

Received Date: Oct 01, 2020 / Accepted Date: Jun 02, 2020 /