GET THE APP

Comparison of Different Types of Barriers Used in Non-Vital Bleaching: A Retrospective Study | Abstract

Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Comparison of Different Types of Barriers Used in Non-Vital Bleaching: A Retrospective Study

Author(s): Debarun David and Pradeep S*

Abstract

Introduction: Despite these excellent properties, GIC(Glass ionomer cements ) also possesses several undesirable characteristics such as long setting time, difficulties in manipulation and insertion, high costs, and potential of discoloration. In order to overcome these limitations, various alternative formulations have been developed. Aim: To compare and evaluate the root reinforcement potential of four different intraorifice barriers: resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and Glass ionomer cements,(GIC) Materials and Methods: The treatment records of patients who had undergone treatment in Saveetha Dental College between 2019 to 2021 were assessed for this study. The extracted data was tabulated in a spreadsheet (Excel 2017: Microsoft Office) and analysed using SPSS 19.0 version software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago). Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were performed with the level of significance at 5% (P<0.05). Conclusion: Future development of the conventional bleaching agents by the addition of radical scavengers such as thiocarbamide or using sodium per carbonate is promising in terms of minimal penetration of hydrogen into the periodontal space.

Share this article

cappadocia tours
cappadocia hotels
cappadocia balloon flights

paper.io

agar io

wormax io